Features of the formation and course of pneumoconiosis in mining and processing plant workers, depending on the smoking status
https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-5-449-454
Abstract
Materials and methods. There was carried out a retrospective analysis of the medical histories of eighty male patients with established pneumoconiosis hospitalized as planned during the period from 2021 up to 2023. Currently, all employees have been withdrawn from the occupation due to the establishment of an occupational disease. The examination of patients included physical examination, chest X-ray, spirometry, body plethysmography, laboratory testing. The working conditions of the surveyed workers were assessed taking into account the information presented in the sanitary and hygienic characteristics of working conditions (form
No. 362-1/u-01). The results of the study were statistically processed using the Statistica 10 Software.
Results. There were no statistically significant regularity between the fact of smoking and average experience in contact with fibrogenic substances before diagnosis, the rate of progression and radiological form of the disease, as well as the number of cases of chronical obstructive pulmonry disease (COPD), bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive bronchitis. A greater number of cases of concomitant diseases of the respiratory system, in particular, chronic bronchitis in smokers, have been established. It is necessary to conduct additional research on a larger cohort of people with an established occupational genesis of pneumoconiosis.
Limitations. The study has regional (Orenburg region) and professional (mining and processing plant workers) limitations.
Conclusion. The smoking status has no significant influence on the formation and course of pneumoconiosis in the workers of the mining and processing plant.
About the Authors
Svetlana V. RaikovaRussian Federation
Svyatoslav I. Mazilov
Russian Federation
Anna A. Chernyshova
Russian Federation
Nataliia E. Komlev
Russian Federation
References
1. Blanc P.D., Seaton A. Pneumoconiosis redux. Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis and silicosis are still a problem. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016; 193(6): 603–5. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201511-2154ED
2. Rivera-Ortega P., Molina-Molina M. Interstitial lung diseases in developing countries. Ann. Glob. Health. 2019; 85(1): 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh
3. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. The world is failing on silicosis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019; 7(4): 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30078-5
4. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Workplace safety and health topics: pneumoconioses. Cincinnati; 2011. Available at: https://cdc.gov/niosh/topics/pneumoconioses/
5. Hoy R.F., Chambers D.C. Silica-related diseases in the modern world. Allergy. 2020; 75(11): 2805–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14202
6. GBD 2016 Occupational Chronic Respiratory Risk Factors Collaborators; GBD 2016 occupational chronic respiratory risk factors collaborators. Global and regional burden of chronic respiratory disease in 2016 arising from non-infectious airborne occupational exposures: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020; 77(3): 142–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-106013
7. Morgan J. Black lung is still a threat. Lancet Respir. Med. 2018; 6(10): 745–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30283-2
8. Чеберячко С.И., Радчук Д.И., Дерюгин О.В. Эффективность шахтёрских респираторов. Гигиена и санитария. 2021; 100(2): 129–34. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-2-129-134 https://elibrary.ru/nnlneb
9. Li T., Yang X., Xu H., Liu H. Early identification, accurate diagnosis, and treatment of silicosis. Can. Respir. J. 2022; 2022: 3769134. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3769134
10. Кашанская Е.П., Липатов Г.Я., Гоголева О.И., Носырева О.М., Ганичева Ю.А., Гусельников С.Р. Плотность лёгочной ткани у работников, длительно подвергавшихся воздействию силикозоопасной пыли. Гигиена и санитария. 2023; 102(11): 1199–203. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-11-1199-1203 https://elibrary.ru/kpjmes
11. Qi X.M., Luo Y., Song M.Y., Liu Y., Shu T., Liu Y., et al. Pneumoconiosis: current status and future prospects. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.). 2021; 134(8): 898–907. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001461
12. Li Y., Cheng Z., Fan H., Hao C., Yao W. Epigenetic changes and functions in pneumoconiosis. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2022; 2022: 2523066. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2523066
13. Смирнова Е.Л., Потеряева Е.Л., Максимов В.Н. Исследование ассоциации полиморфизмов генов I/D CCR5, 4a/b NOS3, VNT ril1rn, I/D CASP8 с ранним развитием и прогрессированием пневмокониоза в послеконтактном периоде. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2017; 57(9): 174–5. https://elibrary.ru/zfqlwf
14. Zhang Z., Zhang X.R., Wang J. [Research progress on immune pathogenesis of pneumoconiosis]. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2022; 40(6): 471–6. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20210428-00235 (in Chinese)
15. Бондарев О.И., Бугаева М.С., Казицкая А.С. Основные патогенетические механизмы пневмосклеротических изменений в лёгких у работников угольной промышленности. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2022; 62(3): 177–84. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2022-62-3-177-184 https://elibrary.ru/stzaxa
16. Райкова С.В., Райкин С.С., Комлева Н.Е., Гаджиева М.К. Распространённость употребления табачных изделий среди работников промышленных предприятий. Гигиена и санитария. 2022; 101(6): 641–4. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-6-641-644 https://elibrary.ru/gvjace
17. Будкарь Л.Н., Терешина Л.Г., Обухова Т.Ю., Бугаева И.В., Карпова Е.А., Шмонина О.Г. Влияние курения на развитие пневмокониозов и пылевых бронхитов. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2011; 87(9): 60–3. https://elibrary.ru/ojlkxr
18. Hessel P.A., Gamble J.F., Nicolich M. Relationship between silicosis and smoking. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 2003; 29(5): 329–36. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.739
19. Fan Y., Xu W., Wang Y., Wang Y., Yu S., Ye Q. Association of occupational dust exposure with combined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumoconiosis: a cross-sectional study in China. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(9): e038874. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038874
20. Su X., Kong X., Yu X., Zhang X. Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023; 13(3): e065114. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065114
21. Wang D., Yang M., Liu Y., Ma J., Shi T., Chen W. Association of silica dust exposure and cigarette smoking with mortality among mine and pottery workers in China. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020; 3(4): e202787. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2787
22. Altınsoy B., Öz İ.İ., Erboy F., Tor M., Atalay F. Emphysema and airflow obstruction in non-smoking coal miners with pneumoconiosis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016; 22: 4887–93. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.901820
23. Luo Y., Qi X.M., Pang J.L., Wang J., Wang C. Omics approaches for exploring pneumoconiosis: a review. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2021; 34(1): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2021.010
24. Казицкая А.С., Жукова А.Г., Ядыкина Т.К., Гуляева О.Н., Панев Н.И. Вклад полиморфных вариантов генов про- и противовоспалительных цитокинов в развитие профессиональной пылевой патологии лёгких у шахтёров. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2023; 63(8): 503–11. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-8-503-511 https://elibrary.ru/bfzggu
25. Обухова Т.Ю., Омельченко О.Г., Будкарь Л.Н., Гурвич В.Б., Плотко Э.Г. Диагностика нарушения механики дыхания у рабочих производства огнеупорных материалов. Гигиена и санитария. 2023; 102(11): 1177–81. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-11-1177-1181 https://elibrary.ru/taxgjt
Review
For citations:
Raikova S.V., Mazilov S.I., Chernyshova A.A., Komlev N.E. Features of the formation and course of pneumoconiosis in mining and processing plant workers, depending on the smoking status. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2024;103(5):449-454. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-5-449-454