Analytical control of residues of the herbicide trifluralin in the assessment of the food safety

Introduction. Trifluralin is a systemic herbicide of the chemical class of dinitroaniline derivatives. During monitoring studies, trifluralin was detected in carrots produced in the Russian Federation. Since trifluralin-based pesticides are not approved for the use in the Russian Federation, residual amounts of the substance are not typical for this crop. To check the contamination of carrots with a pesticide not typical for this crop, confirmatory qualitative and quantitative studies were carried out.

Purpose of the work. Increasing the efficiency of identification and reliability of quantitative results when monitoring food products for safety when performing confirmatory analytical studies using the example of determining trifluralin in carrots to assess the safety of food products intended for the consumer.

Materials and methods. Gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) was used to identify and quantify trifluralin. Samples were prepared for analysis using the QuEChERS method. Identification was carried out by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer using two to four MRM transitions (m/z): 306,1→264,0; 264,0→206,0; 264,0→188,0; 264,0→160,1. Matrix-matched calibration was used for quantitation.

Results. The effectiveness of screening studies when monitoring food products using the GC-MS/MS method can be significantly elevated by increasing the number of MRM transitions (at least 3), controlling the reference retention time of the substance, and maintaining the ratio of confirmatory ions. To obtain a reliable quantification of trifluralin content in carrots, the use of a matrix-matched calibration is recommended.

Limitation. In the study, only carrots were considered as food products.

Conclusion. Confirmation of test results is especially important when determining pesticide residues that are not normally found in a given matrix, or when it is suspected that the maximum permissible level may be exceeded. When conducting a screening study and detecting a food contaminant, contamination of the product can only be reported in advance. Next, a confirmatory analysis is required using a validated quantitative method, including an appropriate calibration procedure. In quantitative analysis, the presence of matrix sample components can cause problems due to sample suppression/enhancement phenomena. Matrix-aware calibration has been shown to be effective in compensating for matrix effects.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require a biomedical ethics committee opinion.

Contribution:
Fedorova N.E. — the concept and design of the study, writing the text, editing;
Dobreva N.I. — the concept and design of the study, collection and processing of the material, statistical analysis, writing the text, editing;
Kozak D.I. — the concept and design of the study;
Ivanov A.I., Sobolev D.N., Panchenko M.N. — collection and processing of the material.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: May 8, 2024 / Accepted: June 19, 2024 / Published: October 16, 2024

1. Chowdhury I.F., Doran G.S., Stodart B.J., Chen C., Wu H. Trifluralin and atrazine sensitivity to selected cereal and legume crops. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040587

2. Tiryaki O., Gözek K., Khan S.U. 14C-Residues of trifluralin in a soil and their uptake by carrots. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1997; 59(1): 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001289900443

3. Karasali H., Pavlidis G., Marousopoulou A., Ambrus A. Occurrence and distribution of trifluralin, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin in soils used for long-term intensive cotton cultivation in central Greece. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 2017; 52(10): 719–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2017.1356678

4. Epp J.B., Schmitzer P.R., Crouse G.D. Fifty years of herbicide research: comparing the discovery of trifluralin and halauxifen-methyl. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2018; 74(1): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4657

5. Gaines T.B., Linder R.E. Acute toxicity of pesticides in adult and weanling rats. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1986; 7(2): 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-0590(86)90160-0

6. de Oliveira B., Pereira L.C., Pazin M., Franco-Bernanrdes M.F., Dorta D.J. Do trifluralin and tebuthiuron impair isolated rat liver mitochondria? Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020; 163: 175–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.012

7. Hakala J.A., Chin Y.P. Abiotic reduction of pendimethalin and trifluralin in controlled and natural systems containing Fe(II) and dissolved organic matter. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010; 58(24): 12840–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102814b

8. Bisceglia K.J., Dharia M., Kaur M., Pavlovici F.A. Leachability and potential ecotoxic impact of trifluralin-impregnated mulch. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018; 25(3): 2972–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0575-0

9. Weichenthal S., Moase C., Chan P. A review of pesticide exposure and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010; 118(8): 1117–25. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901731

10. Huang X., He J., Yan X., Hong Q., Chen K., He Q., et al. Microbial catabolism of chemical herbicides: Microbial resources, metabolic pathways and catabolic genes. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2017; 143: 272–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.11.010

11. Milhome M.A.L., de Lima L.K., de A. Nobre C., de A.F. Lima F., do Nascimento R.F. Effect of ozonization in degradation of trifluralin residues in aqueous and food matrices. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 2018; 53(12): 786–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2018.1505074

12. Wauchope R.D., Buttler T.M., Hornsby A.G., Augustijn-Beckers P.W., Burt J.P. The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database for environmental decision-making. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1992; 123: 1–155.

13. Le Person A., Mellouki A., Muñoz A., Borras E., Martin-Reviejo M., Wirtz K. Trifluralin: photolysis under sunlight conditions and reaction with HO* radicals. Chemosphere. 2007; 67(2): 376–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.023

14. Çinar C.T., Tiryaki O., Uzun O., Basaran M. Adaptation and validation of QuEChERS method for the analysis of trifluralin in wind-eroded soil. J. Environ. Sci. Health. Part B. 2012; 47(9): 842–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2012.693878

15. Ma Y., Xie Z., Halsall C., Möller A., Yang H., Zhong G., et al. The spatial distribution of organochlorine pesticides and halogenated flame retardants in the surface sediments of an Arctic fjord: the influence of ocean currents vs. glacial runoff. Chemosphere. 2015; 119: 953–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.012

16. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Conclusion on pesticide pee review, peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifluralin. EFSA Sci. Rep. 2009; 327: 1–111. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.327r

17. Karasali H., Pavlidis G., Marousopoulou A., Ambrus A. Occurrence and distribution of trifluralin, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin in soils used for long-term intensive cotton cultivation in central Greece. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 2017; 52(10): 719–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2017.1356678

18. Guerrero Ramírez J.R., Ibarra Muñoz L.A., Balagurusamy N., Frías Ramírez J.E., Alfaro Hernández L., Carrillo Campos J. Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023; 24(21): 15969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115969

19. Kong H., Yi L.L., Lan Y.B., Kong F.X., Han X.Â. Exploring the operation mode of spraying cotton defoliation agent by plant protection UAV. Int. J. Precis. Agric. Aviat. 2020; 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33440/j.ijpaa.20200301.65

20. Zhang W.J. Global pesticide use: profile, trend, cost, benefit and more. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2018; 8(1): 1–27. Available at: https://iaees.org/publications/journals/piaees/articles/2018-8(1)/global-pesticide-use-Profile-trend-cost-benefit.pdf

21. Coleman N.V., Rich D.J., Tang F.H.M., Vervoort R.W., Maggi F. Biodegradation and Abiotic Degradation of Trifluralin: A Commonly Used Herbicide with a Poorly Understood Environmental Fate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020; 54(17): 10399–410. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02070

22. Tiryaki O., Gozek K., Yucel U., Ilim M. The effect of food processing on 14C‐trifluralin residues in carrot. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 1996; 53(1-4): 227–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772249609358287

23. Analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed. Supersedes Document No. SANTE/11312/2021 v2/. Available at: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/pesticides_mrl_guidelines_wrkdoc_2021-11312.pdf

24. Recommendations for methods of analysis of pesticide residues (CAC/PR 8 1985). Codex Alimentarius Commission. Rome: FAO, WHO; 1985.

25. Yudina T.V., Fedorova N.E., Lar’kina M.V., Egorchenkova O.E. Determination of residual amounts of chlorothalonil in peaches: problems of gas chromatographic identification with the use of electron capture detector. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2016; 95(11): 1108–12. https://doi.org/10.18821.0016-9900-2016-95-11-1108-1112 https://elibrary.ru/xsnrvr (in Russian)

26. CXG 90-2017. Guidelines on the criteria for the effectiveness of analytical methods used to determine the residual content of pesticides in food and feed. Available at: https://fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/thematic-areas/pesticides/en/

27. Tóth E., Bálint M., Tölgyesi Á. False Positive Identification of Pesticides in Food Using the European Standard Method and LC-MS/MS Determination: Examples and Solutions from Routine Applications. Appl. Sci. 2022; 12: 12005. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312005

28. AOAC Guidelines for Single Laboratory Validation of Chemical Methods for Dietary Supplements and Botanicals. Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists); 2002: 1–38. Available at: https://clck.ru/3Di6mP