Evaluation of biological properties of surface water for domestic and drinking purposes by biotesting method

Introduction. The composition of the water source determined by natural and anthropogenic processes can pose human health risks due to the lack of necessary information on the physicochemical and toxic properties of compounds and imperfection of water treatment technologies. Monitoring of integrated indicators, combined with bioassay and further decoding of biological response predictors, seems to be the most effective solution to water quality and safety evaluation. Bioassay is important for assessing exposure, establishing dose-response relationships and toxicokinetic properties of substances.

The aim was to assess the quality and safety of water based on physicochemical indices and using a cell culture bioassay.

Materials and methods. We tested physicochemical parameters of surface water and treated potable water before being distributed in Spring to Autumn, 2023. The MTT assay was conducted on a human keratinocyte culture describing cell viability. The most significant predictors of cellular response were selected using regression analysis.

Results. We observed seasonal variations in the level of summary indicators and the ionic composition of water. We also revealed excessive concentrations of aluminum and iron in the water source and an elevated permanganate index of treated water. The lowest value of the fibroblast culture viability level was found following exposure to surface water sampled in Spring, while treated water did not reduce cell viability over three seasons.

Limitations. The study did not cover the winter season due to insufficient volume of cell culture available for biotesting.

Conclusions. We established physicochemical quality and safety parameters of source and treated water. Modeling showed that chelated manganese was a predictor of the biological response. The test object used turned out to be insensitive to indicators exceeding the maximum allowable levels in water.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require the submission of a biomedical ethics committee opinion or other documents.

Contributions:
Khlystov I.A. – study conception and design, draft manuscript preparation and editing, bibliography compilation and referencing;
Karpova E.P., Shtin T.N. – data collection and analysis;
Bushueva T.V. – study conception and design, bibliography compilation and referencing, editing;
Kharkova P.K. – bibliography compilation and referencing, data analysis.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: May 6, 2025 / Accepted: June 26, 2025 / Published: July 31, 2025

1. Peets P., Wang W.C., MacLeod M., Breitholtz M., Martin J.W., Kruve A. MS2Tox machine learning tool for predicting the ecotoxicity of unidentified chemicals in water by nontarget LC-HRMS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022; 56(22): 15508–17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02536

2. Rakhmanin Yu.A., Meltser A.V., Kiselev A.V., Erastova N.V. Hygienic substantiation of management decisions with the use of the integral assessment of drinking water on indices of chemical harmlessness and epidemiological safety. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2017; 96(4): 302–5. https://elibrary.ru/ykuqhh (in Russian)

3. Mamonova I.A., Kosheleva I.S., Shirokov A.A., Gusev Yu.S., Mikerov A.N. Using human cell culture to assess the toxicity of water (literature review). Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2023; 102(5): 509–15. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-5-509-515 https://elibrary.ru/zifbgn (in Russian)

4. Pamies D., Hartung T. 21st century cell culture for 21st century toxicology. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2017; 30(1): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00269

5. Wester R.C., Maibach H.I. Human skin binding and absorption of contaminants from ground and surface water during swimming and bathing. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1989; 8(5): 853–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/10915818909018044

6. Supe S., Takudage P. Methods for evaluating penetration of drug into the skin: A review. Skin Res. Technol. 2021; 27(3): 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12968

7. WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda; 2022. Available at: https://who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045064

8. Bogdanova V.D., Alenitskaya M.V., Sakharova O.B. Some methodological approaches to assessing health risks related to potable water quality in centralized water supply systems. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2023; 31(1): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-1-45-52 https://elibrary.ru/pqkkdv (in Russian)

9. Vandenberg L.N., Rayasam S.D.G., Axelrad D.A., Bennett D.H., Brown P., Carignan C.C., et al. Addressing systemic problems with exposure assessments to protect the public’s health. Environ. Health. 2023; 21(Suppl. 1): 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00917-0

10. Xu X., Yu C., Xu L., Xu J. Emerging roles of keratinocytes in nociceptive transduction and regulation. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2022; 15: 982202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.982202

11. Piipponen M., Li D., Landén N.X. The immune functions of keratinocytes in skin wound healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020; 21(22): 8790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228790

12. Khlystov I.A., Kharkova P.K., Bugaeva A.V., Zamolotskikh T.V., Shtin T.N., Gurvich V.B. Determination of key quality indicators for organization of potable water source monitoring under changing climatic conditions. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2022; 30(9): 84–90. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2022-30-9-84-90 https://elibrary.ru/xlhfft (in Russian)

13. Kharina G.V., Aleshina L.V. Analysis of the quality of groundwater in the Sverdlovsk region. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2023; 102(3): 221–8. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-3-221-228 https://elibrary.ru/scvewt (in Russian)

14. Izimetova M.F. Hydrochemical characteristics of large reservoirs of the Sverdlovsk Region. In: Ecological Collection 7: Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference of Young Scientists «Urgent Environmental Problems of the Volga Basin» [Ekologicheskii sbornik 7: Trudy molodykh uchenykh. Vserossiiskaya (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) molodezhnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya]. Tolyatti; 2019: 199–201. https://doi.org/10.24411/9999-010A-2019-10047 https://elibrary.ru/zdldmt (in Russian)

15. Toxicological Profile for Manganese. Atlanta; 2012. Available at: https://atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp151.pdf

16. Gulcin İ., Alwasel S.H. Metal ions, metal chelators and metal chelating assay as antioxidant method. Processes. 2022; 10(1): 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010132

17. Ahamed M.I., Lichtfouse E., Altalhi T., eds. Remediation of Heavy Metals. Cham: Springer; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80334-6

18. Bezuglova O.S., Klimenko A. Application of humic substances in agricultural industry. Agronomy. 2022; 12(3): 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030584

19. Kulikova N.A., Perminova I.V., Badun G.A., Chernysheva M.G., Koroleva O.V., Tsvetkova E.A. Estimation of uptake of humic substances from different sources by Escherichia coli cells under optimum and salt stress conditions by use of tritium-labeled humic materials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010; 76(18): 6223–30. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00905-10

20. Pieńko T., Czarnecki J., Równicki M., Wojciechowska M., Wierzba A.J., Gryko D., et al. Vitamin B12-peptide nucleic acids use the BtuB receptor to pass through the Escherichia coli outer membrane. Biophys. J. 2021; 120(4): 725–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.004

21. Nikaido H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003; 67(4): 593–656. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003

22. Inam M.A., Khan R., Akram M., Khan S., Park D.R., Yeom I.T. Interaction of arsenic species with organic ligands: Competitive removal from water by coagulation‒flocculation‒sedimentation (C/F/S). Molecules. 2019; 24(8): 1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081619

23. Mahmood Y.H., Al-Hilali B.M., Khalaf A.T. Concentration of residual chlorine and its health effects in the drinking water of the Kirkuk City. Kafkas Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018; 11(1): 29–37. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/877290

24. Amin M.M., Fatehizadeh A., Bagheri N. Rapid assessment of toxicity of chlorinated aqueous solution by dissolved oxygen depletion and optical density bioassays. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2020; 7(4): 271–6. https://doi.org/10.34172/EHEM.2020.32

25. Khlystov I.A., Bushueva T.V., Shtin T.N., Karpova E.P., Kharkova P.K., Bugaeva A.V., et al. Usage of rat fibroblasts to assess toxic properties of contaminated water. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2023; 31(9): 38–44. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2023-31-9-38-44 https://elibrary.ru/hsncra (in Russian)

26. Li H., Ding S., Song W., Wang X., Ding J., Lu J. The degradation of dissolved organic matter in black and odorous water by humic substance-mediated Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycle under redox fluctuation. J. Environ. Manage. 2022; 321: 115942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115942

27. Barbusiński K. Fenton reaction – controversy concerning the chemistry. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S. 2009; 16(3): 347–58.

28. Yang Z., Shan C., Pignatello J.J., Pan B. Mn(II) acceleration of the picolinic acid-assisted Fenton reaction: New insight into the role of manganese in homogeneous Fenton AOPs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022; 56(10): 6621–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08796