Preview

Hygiene and Sanitation

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of the risk caused by soil contamination with heavy metals and arsenic for the population at the city with glass production

https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-7-925-929

EDN: jmuobz

Abstract

Introduction. The paper presents the results of the assessment of the carcinogenic risk and the risk of developing non-carcinogenic effects on the health in the population caused by soil pollution with heavy metals and arsenic in the city of Gus-Khrustalny and the Vladimir region.

Materials and methods. The assessment of the risk for population health was carried out in accordance with R 2.1.10.3968-23 based on actual concentrations of gross forms of copper As, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn in the city soil.

Results. In several points of the city the total carcinogenic risk has been established to correspond to the alarming level of risk; in other points – to the permissible level. In the formation of the carcinogenic risk and the total hazard index, the oral route is the priority route of entry. The highest hazard indices are noted for the age group up to 7 years. The nervous system, blood system, respiratory system, skin and cardiovascular system are exposed to the greatest risk in the population of Gus-Khrustalny due to the contamination of urban soils with heavy metals and arsenic.

The limitations of the study are related to the values of exposure factors, reference doses, and tilt factors.

Conclusion. The soils of the city of Gus-Khrustalny, characterized in most points by unfavorable values of hygienic indicators in terms of heavy metals and arsenic, contribute to the risk of general toxic effects in the child population. Multiple elements soil pollution in the city may be one of the reasons for the high values of epidemiological risk indicators for the health of children in the city. The results of the study confirm the need to manage environmental and hygienic monitoring and detoxification of contaminated soils here.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require a biomedical ethics committee opinion.

Conflict of interest. The author declares no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: October 16, 2024 / Revised: May 6, 2025 / Accepted: June 26, 2025 / Published: August 20, 2025

About the Author

Anton A. Martsev
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Vladimir State University named after Alexander G. and Nikolai G. Stoletov
Russian Federation

PhD (Biology), associate professor, Department of Biology and General Genetics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119048, Russian Federation

e-mail: MartsevAA@yandex.ru



References

1. Payuta A.A., Flerova E.A., Zaitseva Yu.V. Distribution of essential and toxic elements in Pelecus cultratus tissues and risk assessment for consumer health. Toxics. 2023; 11(8): 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080715

2. Dai C., Li S., Duan Y., Tu Y., Leong K.H., Zhou L. Human health risk assessment of selected pharmaceuticals in the five major river basins, China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021; 801: 149730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149730

3. Deryabin A.N., Unguryanu T.N., Buzinov R.V. Population health risk caused by exposure to chemicals in soils. Health Risk Analysis. 2019; (3): 18–25. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2019.3.02.eng https://elibrary.ru/rywakz

4. Chashchin V., Kovshov A.A., Thomassen Y., Sorokina T., Gorbanev S.A., Morgunov B., et al. Health risk modifiers of exposure to persistent pollutants among indigenous peoples of Chukotka. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019; 17(1): 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010128

5. Rashid S., Shah I.A., Supe Tulcan R.X., Rashid W., Sillanpaa M. Contamination, exposure, and health risk assessment of Hg in Pakistan: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2022; 301: 118995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118995

6. Rajmohan N., Masoud M.H.Z., Niyazi B.A.M. Appraisal of groundwater quality and health risk in the Yalamlam basin, Saudi Arabia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022; 29(55): 83653–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21708-7

7. Malysheva A.G., Kalinina N.V., Yudin S.M. Chemical air pollution in residential premises as a health risk factor. Health Risk Analysis. 2022; (3): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2022.3.06.eng https://elibrary.ru/kefuwa

8. Hang Yu., Meng X., Li T., Wang T., Cao Ju., Fu Q., et al. Assessment of long-term particulate nitrate air pollution and its health risk in China. iScience. 2022; 25(9): 104899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104899

9. Deng X., Zou B., Li Sh., Wu J., Yao Ch., Shen M., et al. Disease specific air quality health index (aqhi) for spatiotemporal health risk assessment of multi-air pollutants. Environ. Res. 2023; 231(Pt. 1): 115943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115943

10. Calderón-Garcidueñas L., Ayala A. Fine particle air pollution and lung cancer risk: extending the long list of health risks. Cell. 2023; 186(11): 2285–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.033

11. Bretcan P., Tanislav D., Radulescu C., Serban G., Danielescu S., Reid M., et al. Evaluation of shallow groundwater quality at regional scales using adaptive water quality indices. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19(17): 10637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710637

12. Mikhaylichenko K.Yu., Kurbatova A.I., Salazar Flores C.A., Pogorelyy D.P., Konovalova E.E., et al. Public health risk from contamination of drinking water with carcinogenic chemicals in centralized water supply systems. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture. 202; 15(4): 291–306. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-4-291-306 https://elibrary.ru/ttymhu

13. Mahdavi M., Mahvi A.H., Mohebbi M., Teimuri M.H., Mamaghani Nejad M., Hoseinzadeh E., et al. Health risk assessment for reused backwash water from Saveh water treatment plant. J. Adv. Environ. Health Res. 2024; 12(1): 46–51. https://doi.org/10.34172/JAEHR.1329

14. Trifonova T.A., Martsev A.A., Selivanov O.G., Kurbatov Yu.N. Ecological and hygienic assessment of soils on the content of heavy metals and arsenic in an industrial city with glass production. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2023; 102(6): 549–55. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-6-549-555 https://elibrary.ru/lkmlsk (in Russian)

15. Masri S., LeBrón A.M.W., Logue M.D., Valencia E., Ruiz A., Reyes A., et al. Risk assessment of soil heavy metal contamination at the census tract level in the city of Santa Ana, CA: implications for health and environmental justice. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts. 2021; 23(6): 812–30. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1em00007a

16. Chioma V.A., Islamiyat A.O., Sosanya P. Ecological and human health risk assessment of heavy metals contamination of soil in E-Waste Dumpsite in Atan, Ogun State, Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. Res. 2022; 4(1): 1–14.

17. Kleyn S.V., Vekovshinina S.A., Balashov S.Yu., Khoroshavin V.A., Ukhabov V.M. Hygienic evaluation of carcinogenic risk to health of the population living in the zone of the exposure to places of the burial storage of waste of mining and processing enterprises. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2018; 97(1): 10–5. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2018-97-1-10-15 https://elibrary.ru/wcviux (in Russian)

18. Boev V.M., Zelenina L.V., Kudusova L.H., Kryazheva E.A., Zelenin D.O. Hygienic assessment of carcinogenic health risks associated with contamination of depositing media with heavy metals. Health Risk Analysis. 2022; (1): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2022.1.02.eng https://elibrary.ru/amonix

19. Alsafran M., Usman K., Al Jabri H., Rizwan M. Ecological and health risks assessment of potentially toxic metals and metalloids contaminants: A case study of agricultural soils in Qatar. Toxics. 2021; 9(2): 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9020035

20. Ahmad W., Alharthy R.D., Zubair M., Ahmed M., Hameed A., Rafique S. Toxic and heavy metals contamination assessment in soil and water to evaluate human health risk. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11(1): 17006. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94616-4

21. Zhaoyong Z., Mamat A., Simayi Z. Pollution assessment and health risks evaluation of (metalloid) heavy metals in urban street dust of 58 cities in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019; 26(1): 126–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3555-0

22. Kamanina I.Z., Kaplina S.P., Makarov O.A. Carcinogenic risk associated with soil pollution for urban population health. Gigiena i Sanitariya (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2023; 102(3): 299–304. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-3-299-304 https://elibrary.ru/huybjw (in Russian)

23. Rakitskii V.N., Stepkin Yu.I., Klepikov O.V., Kurolap S.A. Assessment of carcinogenic risk caused by the impact of the environmental factors on urban population health. Gigiena i Sanitariya (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal) 2021; 100(3): 188–95. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-3-188-195 (in Russian)

24. Chonokhuu S., Batbold C., Chuluunpurev B., Battsengel E., Dorjsuren B., Byambaa B. Contamination and health risk assessment of heavy metals in the soil of major cities in Mongolia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019; 16(14): 2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142552

25. Grˇzeti´c I., Ahmed Ghariani R.H. Potential health risk assessment for soil heavy metal contamination in the central zone of Belgrade (Serbia). J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2008; 73: 923–34. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC0809923G

26. Martsev A.A. Conjugate analysis of health risks in children and air quality in Vladimir region. Ul’yanovskiy mediko-biologicheskiy zhurnal. 2024; (1): 91–104. https://doi.org/10.34014/2227-1848-2024-1-91-104 (in Russian)

27. Suchkov V.V., Semaeva E.A. Relationship between maximum permissible concentrations and level of health risk for air pollutants. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2017; 96(5): 442–5. https://elibrary.ru/ysqdfd (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Martsev A.A. Assessment of the risk caused by soil contamination with heavy metals and arsenic for the population at the city with glass production. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2025;104(7):925-929. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-7-925-929. EDN: jmuobz

Views: 31


ISSN 0016-9900 (Print)
ISSN 2412-0650 (Online)