

Occupational respiratory diseases in workers engaged in nickel production
https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-8-1035-1042
EDN: eusizq
Abstract
Introduction. Upgrading of nickel production technologies, in this case the transition from electrolytic to more modern electroextractive refining, is not always accompanied by an improvement in the working conditions in the employees involved.
The aim of the study. To analyze working conditions and occupational respiratory diseases in workers at electrolytic and electroextractive nickel production.
Materials and methods. We studied the data of industrial control at nickel industry enterprises and the Murmansk regional register of occupational diseases for 2004–2023.
Results. A comparative analysis of hygienic data revealed a 2.4-3.5-fold decrease in the concentration of nickel hydroaerosols at the electrolytic bath operator workplaces and a 4.4–31.4-fold increase in chlorine concentrations in the workplace air of the hydrometallurgical department during the transition to electroextractive refining. Clinical studies have shown the transition to electroextraction method to be accompanied by a decline in the number and in the proportion of workers with occupational respiratory diseases (p=0.002–0.003), a 24.5% decrease in the level of occupational morbidity (from 56.12 cases to 42.35 cases per 10,000 workers), a decrease in the risk of developing respiratory occupational diseases (OR=1.89; 95% CI 1.31–2.73). Over 10 years, only one case of acute chlorine poisoning was registered.
Conclusion. We have no found adverse impact of elevated chlorine concentrations on the development of occupational respiratory diseases in workers engaged in electrowinning nickel refining. However, further improvement of nickel electrowinning technology is necessary to reduce the concentration of nickel and chlorine salt hydroaerosols, as well as more effective personal respiratory protection equipment is needed. The impact of working conditions on workers’ health during electrowinning nickel refining requires a longer study.
Compliance with ethical standards. Ethics approval was not required for this study.
Contribution:
Syurin S.A. — study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, bibliography compilation and referencing, writing text;
Kovshov A.A. — data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, writing text;
Kiryanova M.N. — analysis and interpretation of results, bibliography compilation and referencing, writing text;
Shilnikovskaya A.V. — data collection.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding. The study had no sponsorship.
Received: April 25, 2025 / Revised: July 10, 2025 / Accepted: July 14, 2025 / Published: September 25, 2025
About the Authors
Sergei A. SyurinRussian Federation
DSc (Medicine), senior researcher, Department of Hygiene, Northwest Public Health Research Center, Saint Petersburg, 191036, Russian Federation
e-mail: kola.reslab@mail.ru
Aleksandr A. Kovshov
Russian Federation
PhD (Medicine), acting head, Hygiene Department, Senior Researcher, Northwest Public Health Research Center, Saint Petersburg, 191036, Russian Federation
e-mail: a.kovshov@s-znc.ru
Marina N. Kiryanova
Russian Federation
PhD (Medicine), senior researcher, Labor Hygiene Department, Northwest Public Health Research Center, Saint Petersburg, 191036, Russian Federation
e-mail: mrn@ro.ru
Alena V. Shilnikovskaya
Russian Federation
Hygienist, Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology in the Murmansk Region in the city of Monchegorsk, the city of Olenegorsk and Lovozersky district, Monchegorsk, 184511, Russian Federation
e-mail: yglovsaya@mail.ru
References
1. Nikanov A.N., Chashchin V.P., Novikova Yu.A., Gudkov A.B., Popova O.N. Manufacturing-conditioned morbidity among non-ferrous workers in pyro-metallurgic way of nickel production. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2021; 61(5): 305–10. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-5-305-310 https://elibrary.ru/arabrr (in Russian)
2. Cherkay Z.N., Shilov V. The question of workers occupational diseases in the mining and metallurgical industry. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten’ (nauchno-tekhnicheskii zhurnal). 2015; (S7): 641–9. https://elibrary.ru/uqgdzt (in Russian)
3. Syurin S.A., Kizeev A.N. Health risks from exposure to chemicals in arctic enterprises. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2022; 101(8): 954–62. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-8-954-962 https://elibrary.ru/baisaw (in Russian)
4. Rocheva I.I., Leshtaeva N.R. Working conditions and health status of woman employed at the nickel production plants in kola polar region. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2008; (10): 47–9. https://elibrary.ru/jurehh (in Russian)
5. Syurin S.A., Vinnikov D.V. Occupational health risks during nickel electrolysis production (longitudinal epidemiological study). Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2023; 63(1): 31–8. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-1-31-38 https://elibrary.ru/fqsrrg (in Russian)
6. Syurin S.A., Nikanov A.N. Health risks from exposure to industrial aerosols of soluble and insoluble nickel compounds. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2024; 103(8): 876–83. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-8-876-883 https://elibrary.ru/crnmsm (in Russian)
7. Prueitt R.L., Li W., Chang Y.C., Boffetta P., Goodman J.E. Systematic review of the potential respiratory carcinogenicity of metallic nickel in humans. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2020; 50(7): 605–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2020.1803792
8. Seilkop S.K., Lightfoot N.E., Berriault C.J., Conard B.R. Respiratory cancer mortality and incidenceinan updated cohort of Canadian nickel production workers. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health. 2017; 72(4): 204–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2016.1199532
9. Syurin S., Vinnikov D. Occupational disease claims and non-occupational morbidity in a prospective cohort observation of nickel electrolysis workers. Sci. Rep. 2022; 12(1): 7092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11241-5
10. Shur P.Z., Redko S.V., Fadeev A.G., Goryaev D.V., Fokin V.A. Assessment of working conditions and health conditions of employees of non-ferrous metallurgy enterprises. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2023; 63(8): 537–44. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2023-63-8-537-544 https://elibrary.ru/swennz (in Russian)
11. Nikanov А.N., Chashchin V.P. Hygienic assessment of exposure and determination of its value in production of nickel, copper and cobalt at mining and smelting complex in Kola High North. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2008; (10): 9–14. https://elibrary.ru/juredv (in Russian)
12. Rahayu T., Sunarsih S., Jayadipraja E.A. Factors related to occupational diseases in smelter employees PT. Virtue Dragon nickel industry site Morosi. Int. J. Health Sci. 2023; 2(1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.54883/wish.v2i1.29
13. Syurin S.A., Shilov V.V. Bronchopulmonary pathology among nickel industry workers: development, diagnostics and clinical manifestations. Profilakticheskaya i klinicheskaya meditsina. 2015; (4): 50–6. https://elibrary.ru/vooist (in Russian)
14. Syurin S.A., Polyakova E.M., Kizeev A.N. Risk management of occupational pathology development in the occupational safety and health system of nickel industry workers. Metallurg. 2023; (4): 115–24. https://doi.org/10.52351/00260827_2023_05_115 https://elibrary.ru/qpgexe (in Russian)
15. Zingalev I.O., Oleinikov A.A., Nizhegorodov A.A. Implementation of modern personal protective equipment at Kola Mining and Metallurgical Company. Tsvetnye metally. 2024; (12): 19–22. (in Russian)
16. Tsapakh S.L., Demidov K.A., Khomchenko O.A., Sadovskaya G.I. Mechanism of processing of copper*nickel matte concerning chlorine based on technology of electrolytic nickel production. Tsvetnye metally. 2009; (9): 72–5. https://elibrary.ru/kyulch (in Russian)
17. Khomchenko O.A., Sadovskaya G.I., Dubrovskiy V.L., Smirnov P.V., Tsapakh S.L. Development and implementation of chloride technology for nickel and cobalt production at OJSC “Kola Mining and Metallurgical Company”. Tsvetnye metally. 2014; (9): 81–8. https://elibrary.ru/snnecj (in Russian)
18. Baronin E.A., Shevtsov A.V., Smirnov P.V. Research in the field of producing advanced types of nickel products. Tsvetnye metally. 2024; (11): 18–24. https://doi.org/10.17580/tsm.2024.11.02 (in Russian)
19. Lee H.W., Jose C.C., Cuddapah S. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: Insights into nickel-induced lung diseases. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021; 76: 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.05.020
20. Kaptsov V.A., Chirkin A.V. Requirements to respiratory protection for workers (world practices reviewed). Health Risk Analysis. 2020; (4): 188–95. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2020.4.21.eng https://elibrary.ru/jbwqgf
21. Kaptsov V.A., Pankova V.B., Chirkin A.V. Improving respiratory protection from gases using filtering respirators (Review of problems). Meditsina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. 2021; (2): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.24411/2411-3794-2021-10201 https://elibrary.ru/vnkkuf (in Russian)
22. Nicholson K., Makovski T.T., Griffith L.E., Raina P., Stranges S., van den Akker M. Multimorbidity and comorbidity revisited: refining the concepts for international health research. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2019; 105: 142–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.008
23. Syurin S., Vinnikov D. Occupational multimorbidity in the nickel industry workers. Int. J. Circumpolar Health. 2023; 82(1): 2231618. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2231618
Review
For citations:
Syurin S.A., Kovshov A.A., Kiryanova M.N., Shilnikovskaya A.V. Occupational respiratory diseases in workers engaged in nickel production. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2025;104(8):1035-1042. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-8-1035-1042. EDN: eusizq