Preview

Hygiene and Sanitation

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of cytotoxicity of peat smoke extract on 3T3-SV40 cell culture

https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-11-1549-1553

EDN: hskznr

Abstract

Introduction. In recent decades, wildfires have become more frequent and intense in many fire-prone areas. However, the mechanisms of smoke cytotoxicity at the cellular level are poorly understood. The study of peat smoke extract (PSE) cytotoxicity in fibroblasts is an important model for studying the acute and chronic effects of smoke exposure.

Materials and methods. The cytotoxicity of peat smoke was assessed in a series of in vitro experiments using PSE in 8 dilutions (12.5, 25, 37.5, 50, 62.5, 75, 87.5 and 100%) on 3T3-SV forty mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The cytotoxic effect was assessed after 24-hour incubation by determining the concentration of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the culture medium and performing the MTT test; a morphological assessment of the cells was given.

Results. The results of the study indicate that PSE primarily leads to a decrease in the metabolic activity in fibroblasts, as evidenced by a lower value of the mean inhibitory concentration (IC50) (53.6%) calculated by the MTT test. When assessing the cytotoxic effect of PSE in the LDH test, a sharp decrease in cell viability was observed at its concentration above 62.5%, the IC50 value in this test was 57.7%.

Limitations. The study is limited to the investigation of the cytotoxicity of PSE on the 3T3-SV 40 cell culture using morphological assessment, MTT test and determination of LDH concentration.

Conclusion. As a result of the conducted studies, an assessment of the impact of peat smoke on fibroblasts in vitro was carried out, with the help of which a primary toxicological characteristic of PSE was given.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research (Protocol No.7 of 12/15/2023), conducted in accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experiments or for Other Scientific Purposes (ETS N 123), Directive 2010/63/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 09/22/2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Contribution:
Abramova V.A. – concept and design of research, data collection and processing, statistical data processing, text writing, editing;
Vokina V.A. – concept and design of research, data collection and processing, statistical data processing, text writing;
Sosedova L.M.
– concept and design of research, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The work was carried out according to the research plan within the framework of the state task.

Received: July 20, 2025 / Revised: October 3, 2025 / Accepted: October 15, 2025 / Published: December 19, 2025

About the Authors

Vera A. Abramova
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

PhD (Pharmacology), senior researcher, Laboratory of biomodelling and translational medicine, East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, 665827, Russian Federation

e-mail: tyutrina.v.a@yandex.ru



Vera A. Vokina
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

PhD (Biology), senior researcher, Laboratory of biomodelling and translational medicine, East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, 665827, Russian Federation

e-mail: vokina.vera@gmail.com



Larisa M. Sosedova
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

DSc (Medicine), professor, head, Laboratory of biomodelling and translational medicine, East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, 665827, Russian Federation

e-mail: sosedlar@mail.ru



References

1. Martin W.K., Schladweiler M.C., Oshiro W., Smoot J., Fisher A., Williams W., et al. Wildfire-related smoke inhalation worsens cardiovascular risk in sleep disrupted rats. Front. Environ. Health. 2023; (2): 1166918. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvh.2023.1166918

2. David P., Dunsford D., Lu J., Moochhala S. Animal models of smoke inhalation induced injuries. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed). 2009; 14(12): 4618–30. https://doi.org/10.2741/3554

3. Migliaccio C.T., Mauderly J.L. Biomass smoke exposures: toxicology and animal study design. Inhal. Toxicol. 2010; 22(2): 104–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958370903008870

4. Krewski D., Acosta D. Jr., Andersen M., Anderson H., Bailar J.C. 3rd, Boekelheide K., et al. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2010; 13(2–4): 51–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176

5. Ashrin A., Anna E., Peyret E., Barbier G., Floreani M., Pointart C., et al. Evaluation of the toxicity of combustion smokes at the air-liquid interface: a comparison between two lung cell models and two exposure methods. Arch. Toxicol. 2025; 99(4): 1471–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-03964-x

6. Ihantola T., Di Bucchianico S., Happo M., Ihalainen M., Uski O., Bauer S., et al. Influence of wood species on toxicity of log-wood stove combustion aerosols: a parallel animal and air-liquid interface cell exposure study on spruce and pine smoke. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2020; 17(1): 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00355-1

7. Marchetti S., Bengalli R., Floris P., Colombo A., Mantecca P. Combustion-derived particles from biomass sources differently promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition on A549 cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2021; 95(4): 1379–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-02983-8

8. La Rocca G., Anzalone R., Magno F., Farina F., Cappello F., Zummo G. Cigarette smoke exposure inhibits extracellular MMP-2 (gelatinase A) activity in human lung fibroblasts. Respir. Res. 2007; 8(1): 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-8-23

9. Wong L.S., Green H.M., Feugate J.E., Yadav M., Nothnagel E.A., Martins-Green M. Effects of «second-hand» smoke on structure and function of fibroblasts, cells that are critical for tissue repair and remodeling. BMC Cell Biol. 2004; 5(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-5-13

10. Vokina V.A., Andreeva E.S., Novikov M.A., Sosedova L.M. Device for modeling intoxication in small laboratory animals with biomass combustion products. Patent RF №213283; 2022. (in Russian)

11. Lemeshevskaya E.P., Kurenkova G.V., Zhukova E.V. Occupational Health Risks to Workers in Industrial Enterprises [Professional’nyi risk zdorov’yu rabotnikov promyshlennykh predpriyatii]. Irkutsk; 2016. https://elibrary.ru/ikagty (in Russian)

12. Kunitomo M., Yamaguchi Y., Kagota S., Yoshikawa N., Nakamura K., Shinozuka K. Biochemical evidence of atherosclerosis progression mediated by increased oxidative stress in apolipoprotein E-deficient spontaneously hyperlipidemic mice exposed to chronic cigarette smoke. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2009; 110(3): 354–61. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.09100fp

13. Yamaguchi Y., Nasu F., Harada A., Kunitomo M. Oxidants in the gas phase of cigarette smoke pass through the lung alveolar wall and raise systemic oxidative stress. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2007; 103(3): 275–82. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.fp0061055

14. Asano H., Horinouchi T., Mai Y., Sawada O., Fujii S., Nishiya T., et al. Nicotine- and tar-free cigarette smoke induces cell damage through reactive oxygen species newly generated by PKC-dependent activation of NADPH oxidase. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012; 118(2): 275–87. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.11166fp

15. Mai Y., Higashi T., Terada K., Hatate C., Nepal P., Horiguchi M., et al. Nicotine- and tar-free cigarette smoke extract induces cell injury via intracellular Ca2+-dependent subtype-specific protein kinase C activation. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012; 120(4): 310–4. https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.12219sc

16. Corsini E., Budello S., Marabini L., Galbiati V., Piazzalunga A., Barbieri P., et al. Comparison of wood smoke PM2.5 obtained from the combustion of FIR and beech pellets on inflammation and DNA damage in A549 and THP-1 human cell lines. Arch. Toxicol. 2013; 87(12): 2187–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-013-1071-z

17. Hansson A., Rankin G., Uski O., Friberg M., Pourazar J., Lindgren R., et al. Reduced bronchoalveolar macrophage phagocytosis and cytotoxic effects after controlled short-term exposure to wood smoke in healthy humans. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2023; 20(1): 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-023-00541-x

18. Bølling A.K., Totlandsdal A.I., Sallsten G., Braun A., Westerholm R., Bergvall C., et al. Wood smoke particles from different combustion phases induce similar pro-inflammatory effects in a co-culture of monocyte and pneumocyte cell lines. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2012; 9(1): 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-9-45

19. Kasurinen S., Jalava P.I., Happo M.S., Sippula O., Uski O., Koponen H., et al. Particulate emissions from the combustion of birch, beech, and spruce logs cause different cytotoxic responses in A549 cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2017; 32(5): 1487–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.22369

20. Lee T.S., Liu Y.J., Tang G.J., Yien H.W., Wu Y.L., Kou Y.R. Wood smoke extract promotes both apoptosis and proliferation in rat alveolar epithelial type II cells: the role of oxidative stress and heme oxygenase-1. Crit. Care Med. 2008; 36(9): 2597–606. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318184979c

21. Krimmer D., Ichimaru Y., Burgess J., Black J., Oliver B. Exposure to biomass smoke extract enhances fibronectin release from fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12): e83938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083938


Review

For citations:


Abramova V.A., Vokina V.A., Sosedova L.M. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of peat smoke extract on 3T3-SV40 cell culture. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2025;104(11):1549-1553. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-11-1549-1553. EDN: hskznr

Views: 21


ISSN 0016-9900 (Print)
ISSN 2412-0650 (Online)