Preview

Hygiene and Sanitation

Advanced search

Biological indices in the monitoring system of urbanized soils

https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2017-96-11-1091-1096

Abstract

Current methodological guidelines for assessing the quality of soils in populated areas do not include ecotoxicological indices, thereby underestimate the potential danger of the negative impact of urban soils on the health of the population. Monitoring of soil quality is carried out according to established indices. Sanitary-parasitological and sanitary-bacteriological studies, of course, play a primary role in the establishment both of the category of soil contamination in populated areas, and basic physic-chemical parameters. The list of controlled elements contains heavy metals, benz (a) pyrene, arsenic and several others, but there are no whole classes of chemical compounds with a high level of public health hazard, such as polychlorinated biphenyls, in spite of the fact that the study of the distribution of this group of substances in the soil profile of Moscow is being included in modern scientific research work for a long time. Thus, the lack of data on the content of a number of key chemical toxicants in the soil can form a distorted final assessment of the quality of the studied soils. Ultimately, this can lead to a number of mistakes in management decisions for the improvement of the territories of Moscow and the replacement of soils with artificially created soil. One of the solutions to this problem may be the expansion of the list of physic-chemical indices in monitoring. Another one is the inclusion of ecotoxicological indices for conducting a comprehensive diagnosis of "health" of soils. Such an approach will make it possible to assess the soils more correctly, taking into account all the factors of soil formation in the territory of Moscow, including intensive multifactor anthropogenic impact on soils, which is difficult to estimate only with the help of physical and chemical methods. In the work results of own researches on an estimation of the biological activity of soils of Moscow of various functional zones are presented.

About the Authors

Mariia A. Vodyanova
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, DSci., acting the head of laboratory of soil hygiene of the Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks.

e-mail: lab.pochva@sysin.ru



I. A. Kriatov
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


L. G. Donerian
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


I. S. Evseeva
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


D. I. Ushakov
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


A. V. Sbitnev
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


N. A. Kiryakova
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


N. S. Antropova
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


V. O. Pyrkin
Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks
Russian Federation


N. N. Tsapkova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation


E. V. Bashirov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Resolution of the Government of Moscow № 514-PP «On improving the quality of soil in the city of Moscow». Moscow; 2004. (in Russian)

2. Federal Law № 384-FZ «Technical Regulations on the Safety of Buildings and Structures». Moscow; 2009. (in Russian)

3. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation № 20 «On engineering surveys for the preparation of project documentation, construction, reconstruction of capital construction projects». Moscow; 2006. (in Russian)

4. SP 47.13330.2012. Engineering surveys for construction. Basic provisions. Moscow; 2012. (in Russian)

5. Ignat’eva I.A. Technical regulations with requirements in the field of environmental protection: opportunities, problems, prospects. Biznes, menedzhment i pravo. 2014; (1). (in Russian)

6. Meinardi C.R. Soil quality. Fertile ground for standardization. ASTM Standardization News. 1996; (2): 8–12.

7. Agreement on the conduct of a coordinated policy in the field of standardization. 15th IGU meeting: There are problems, there are no disagreements. Standarty i kachestvo. 1999; (7): 3–6. (in Russian)

8. Interim technical report. Activity block 10 – Environmental quality standards. St. Petersburg; 2008. (in Russian)

9. Carlon C., ed. Canadian Guiding Principles (CCME, 1999). Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe. A review and evaluation of national procedures for harmonization. Ispra: European Commission, Joint Research Center; 2007.

10. GOST R ISO 23909–2013. Soil quality. Preparation of laboratory samples from large samples. Moscow; 2013. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Vodyanova M.A., Kriatov I.A., Donerian L.G., Evseeva I.S., Ushakov D.I., Sbitnev A.V., Kiryakova N.A., Antropova N.S., Pyrkin V.O., Tsapkova N.N., Bashirov E.V. Biological indices in the monitoring system of urbanized soils. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2017;96(11):1091-1096. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2017-96-11-1091-1096

Views: 324


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-9900 (Print)
ISSN 2412-0650 (Online)