Aircraft noise in residential areas, problems of measuring and evaluation
Igor V. Bukhtiyarov,
Nicolay N. Courierov,
Alla V. Lagutina,
Lyudmila V. Prokopenko,
Evgeny V. Zibarev https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-10-1042-1048
Abstract
The intensity of civil aircraft flights elevates with the increase in the number of passenger and cargo transportation by air. Aircraft noise in the residential area near airports grows up too despite the use of low-noise aircraft models by airlines. This causes an augmentation in the number of complaints of the population in these areas. The Russian Federation’s normative and methodological documents requirements in force relating to measurements and assessment of noise in residential areas, including "aircraft noise", were analyzed. Their requirements in terms of measuring and assessing noise in residential areas, including “aircraft noise”, testifies to the insufficiency and ambiguity of these requirements. The main disadvantages are the lack of a clear definition of which sound event is considered «aircraft noise» and the lack of requirements for the duration of the reference time interval of noise measurement. The foreign experience of measuring and evaluating aircraft noise, as well as the effects of such noise on the population, are considered. This made it possible to determine the necessary and sufficient parameters for noise control in residential areas, including «aircraft noise». There were proposed both a definition of «aircraft noise» and the necessary parameters for its assessment. The necessary duration of the reference time interval for the measurement of normalized parameters was justified. Method for the normalized noise parameters in residential areas measurement using the chronograms of sound levels A was proposed. The technical implementation of such a method is presented. Proposed a definition of «aircraft noise» and measuring normalized parameters in the 15-minute reference time interval for inclusion in regulatory and methodological documents will help to eliminate ambiguity in measurements and noise assessment in residential areas.
About the Authors
Igor V. Bukhtiyarov
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupation Health
Россия
Россия
Nicolay N. Courierov
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupation Health
Россия
Россия
MD, Ph.D., leading researcher in physical factors laboratory of Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health, Moscow, 105275, Russian Federation.
e-mail: courierov@mail.ru
Alla V. Lagutina
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupation Health
Россия
Россия
Lyudmila V. Prokopenko
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupation Health
Россия
Россия
Evgeny V. Zibarev
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupation Health
Россия
Россия
References
1. The Washington Post. Analysis: Where noisy roads and airports take the biggest toll on our health and sanity. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/29/where-noisy-roads-and-airports-take-the-biggest-toll-on-our-health-and-sanity/
2. WHO. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe; 2011. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326424
3. United States Department of Transportation. Aviation Noise; 2018. Available at : https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/policy_guidance/noise/
4. e-CFR PART 150 - Airport noise compatibility planning. Available at: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?mc=true&node=pt14.3.150&rgn=div5
5. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0049&from=EN
6. Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Pershagen G., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., Cadum E., et al. Association between noise annoyance and high blood pressure. Preliminary results from the HYENA study. In: 36th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering. Istanbul; 2007
7. Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Pershagen G., Cadum E., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., et al. Annoyance due to aircraft noise has increased over the years - results of the HYENA study. Environ. Int. 2009; 35(8): 1169-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.012
8. Babisch W. Noise and Health. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005; 113(1): A14-5. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.113-a14
9. Peters J.L., Zevitas C.D., Redline S., Hastings A., Sizov N., Hart J.E., et al. Aviation noise and cardiovascular health in the United States: a review of the evidence and recommendations for research direction. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 2018; 5(2): 140-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-018-0151-2
10. Kroesen M., Schreckenberg D. A measurement model for general noise reaction in response to aircraft noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011; 129(1): 200-10. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3514542
11. Akbari M. Review of Sustainable Environmental Development Strategies. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2018; 4: 18-27.
12. Kountouras M., Curcurut S., Mazzocchi E., Sacchetti F., Silvaggio R., Vaccaro L. Noise characterization and management of Italian city airports: experiences and proposals; 2014. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Aircraft-pass-by-landings-noise-measurement-time-history-with-event-analysis_fig5_305115533
13. Fleming G.G., Volpe J.A. DTS-75-FA653-LR5. Aircraft Noise Measurement. Instrumentation and Techniques. Washington; 1996.
Review
For citations:
Bukhtiyarov I.V., Courierov N.N., Lagutina A.V., Prokopenko L.V., Zibarev E.V. Aircraft noise in residential areas, problems of measuring and evaluation. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2020;99(10):1042-1048. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-10-1042-1048
Views:
708
JATS XML
Email this article 