Preview

Hygiene and Sanitation

Advanced search

Comparative characteristics of acute toxicity of gadolinium-containing drugs for MRI diagnostics

https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2026-105-3-327-332

EDN: qflhdz

Abstract

Introduction. Improving the accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of magnetic contrast media for MRI diagnostics is an urgent task for both clinical medicine and researcher. Therefore, the introduction of new innovative drugs opens up additional opportunities for assessing the functional state of organs and tissues, significantly increasing the accuracy of diagnosis and the effectiveness of treatment.

Materials and methods. The parameters of acute toxicity, species and sexual sensitivity to an innovative drug containing gadolinium nanoparticles stabilized with arabinogalactane (GD-AH) and a commercial drug for MRI studies, Gadodiamide (a reference drug), were evaluated using the intragastric route of administration in outbred rats of both sexes at a dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight (b.w.). Additionally, acute toxicity assessment for the innovative drug GD-AG was performed with intraperitoneal administration in mice at doses of 2000 and 300 mg/kg b.w.

Results. Intragastric administration of Gadodiamide and the innovative Gd-AG nanocomposite to rats of both sexes caused neither the death of animals nor changes in internal organs during macroscopic examination. Intraperitoneal administration of 2000 mg/kg b.w. GD-AG to mice resulted in 100% death. A dose of 300 mg/kg b.w. did not cause death, but macroscopic changes in internal organs were observed.

Limitations. The study is limited to studying the acute toxicity parameters of an innovative drug containing gadolinium nanoparticles stabilized with arabinogalactane (GD-AG) and a commercial drug for MRI studies, Gadodiamide.

Conclusion. According to the toxicometric parameters of acute toxicity, the average lethal doses for intragastric administration of the commercial drug Gadodiamide and the innovative nanocomposite Gd-AG to rats do not differ from each other and are definted as >2000 mg/kg b.w., which characterizes them as substances with a low risk of acute toxicity (hazard class V). The average lethal dose for the intraperitoneal route of administration of Gd-AG nanocomposite is in the range of 300 mg/kg b.w. < LD50 < 2000 mg/kg b.w., which belongs to the IV class of acute toxicity according to the classification of K.K.Sidorov and is defined as a substance with low toxicity.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the FSBSI VSIMEI (Protocol No. 8 dated 12/15/2023), conducted in accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experiments or Other Scientific Purposes (ETS N 123), Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union 2010/63/EC dated 09/22/2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Contribution:
Sosedova L.M. – research concept and design, statistical data processing, text writing, editing;
Novikov M.A. – data collection and processing, statistical data processing, text writing;
Titov E.A. – literary study, data collection and processing, statistical data processing;
Pankova A.A. – data collection and processing, statistical data processing;
Vokina V.A. – data collection and processing, statistical data processing, text writing;
Konkova T.V. – data collection and processing, synthesis of nanocomposite, statistical data processing;
Sukhov B.G.
– research concept and design, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The research was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation. Project No. 25-25-00036 "Toxicity and diagnostic properties of a promising contrast agent containing gadolinium nanoparticles encapsulated in an arabinogalactan polymer matrix".

Received: July 8, 2025 / Accepted: October 15, 2025 / Published: April 17, 2026

About the Authors

Larisa M. Sosedova
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

DSc (Medicine), professor, head, Laboratory of biomodeling and translational medicine, East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, 665827, Russian Federation

e-mail: sosedlar@mail.ru



Mikhail A. Novikov
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

PhD (Biology), senior researcher, Laboratory of biomodeling and translational medicine, East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

e-mail: novik-imt@mail.ru



Evgeny A. Titov
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

PhD. (Biology), senior researcher, Laboratory of biomodeling and translational medicine, East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

e-mail: g57097@yandex.ru



Anna A. Pankova
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

Junior researcher, Laboratory of biomodeling and translational medicine of the East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, 665827, Russian Federation

e-mail: nyuta.pankova.96@mail.ru



Vera A. Vokina
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

PhD (Biology), senior researcher, Laboratory of biomodelling and translational medicine of the East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, 665827, Russian Federation

e-mail: vokina.vera@gmail.com



Tatyana V. Kon’kova
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion SB RAS
Russian Federation

PhD (Chemistry), researcher, Nanoparticles laboratory, Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation

e-mail: konbuivol_2@yahoo.com



Boris G. Sukhov
Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion SB RAS
Russian Federation

PhD (Chemistry), leading researcher, Nanoparticles laboratory, Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation

e-mail: boris_sukhov@mail.ru



References

1. Rink P.A. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine [Magnitnyi rezonans v meditsine]. Мoscow: GEOTAR-Med; 2003. (in Russian)

2. Abuzarova M.I. Contrast agents in radiation diagnostics and their classification. Vestnik NGU imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2017; 3(1): 71–7. (in Russian)

3. Hao D., Ai T., Goerner F., Hu X., Runge V.M., Tweedle M. MRI contrast agents: basic chemistry and safety. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2012; 36(5): 1060–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23725

4. Weinmann H.J., Brasch R.C., Press W.R., Wesbey G.E. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agentю. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1984; 142(3): 619–24. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.142.3.619

5. Heverhagen J., Krombach G., Gizewski E. Application of extracellular gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents and the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Rofo. 2014; 186(7): 661–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1356403

6. Idée J.M., Fretellier N., Robic C., Corot C. The role of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a critical update. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2014; 44(10): 895–913. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2014.955568

7. Hui F.K., Mullins M. Persistence of gadolinium contrast enhancement in CSF: a possible harbinger of gadolinium neurotoxicity? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(1): E1. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1205

8. Blasco-Perrin H., Glaser B., Pienkowski M., Peron J.M., Payen J.L. Gadolinium induced recurrent acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013; 13(1): 88–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2012.12.002

9. Akgun H., Gonlusen G., Cartwright J. Jr., Suki W.N., Truong L.D. Are gadolinium-based contrast media nephrotoxic? A renal biopsy study. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2006; 130(9): 1354–7. https://doi.org/10.5858/2006-130-1354-AGCMNA

10. Sukhov B.G., Konkova T.V., Ivanov A.V. Water-soluble magnetoactive nanobiocomposites of gadolinium flavonoid complexes based on a natural conjugate of arabinogalactan with bioflavonoids and a method for obtaining these nanobiocomposites. Patent RF No. 2706705; 2019. https://elibrary.ru/fwwnjl (in Russian)

11. Trofimov B.A., Sukhov B.G., Aleksandrova G.P., Medvedeva S.A., Grishchenko L.A., Mal’kina A.G., et al. Nanocomposites with magnetic, optical, catalytic, and biologically active properties based on Arabinogalactan. Doklady Chemistry. 2003; 393(4-6): 287–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DOCH.0000010332.05066.4b https://elibrary.ru/liezlp

12. Titov E.A., Sosedova L.M., Novikov M.A., Zvereva M.V., Rukavishnikov V.S., Lakhman O.L. The analysis of acute and subacute toxicity of silver selenide nanoparticles encapsulated in arabinogalactan polymer matrix. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(15): 3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153200

13. Khabriev R.U., ed. Guide to the Experimental Study of New Pharmacological Substances [Rukovodstvo po eksperimental’nomu izucheniyu novykh farmakologicheskikh veshchestv]. Moscow: Meditsina; 2005. (in Russian)

14. Merkulov G.A. Course in Pathological and Histological Techniques [Kurs patologogistologicheskoi tekhniki]. Мoscow; 1969. (in Russian)

15. Rukavishnikov V.S., Sosedova L.M., Vokina V.A., Titov E.A., Novikov M.A., Yakimova N.L. Assessment of neurotoxicity of nanometals encapsulated on arabinogalactan matrix. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2017; 57(10): 25–9. https://elibrary.ru/ztuvhr (in Russian)

16. Sukhov B.G., Trofimov B.A. Directed synthesis of nanobiocomposites with an unusual complex of magnetic, optical, catalytic, and biologically active properties. In: Magnetic Materials. New Technologies. Abstracts of the VIII Baikal International Conference [Magnitnye materialy. Novye tekhnologii. Tezisy dokladov VIII Baikal’skoi mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii]. Irkutsk; 2018. https://elibrary.ru/uwihgn (in Russian)

17. Kanal E., Tweedle M.F. Residual or retained gadolinium: practical implications for radiologists and our patients. Radiology. 2015; 275(3): 630–4. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015150805

18. Idée J.M., Port M., Robic C., Medina C., Sabatou M., Corot C. Role of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters in gadolinium chelate stability. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2009; 30(6): 1249–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21967

19. Pałasz A., Czekaj P. Toxicological and cytophysiological aspects of lanthanides action. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2000; 47(4): 1107–14.

20. Feng X., Xia Q., Yuan L., Yang X., Wang K. Impaired mitochondrial function and oxidative stress in rat cortical neurons: implications for gadolinium-induced neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology. 2010; 31(4): 391–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2010.04.003

21. Xia Q., Feng X., Huang H., Du L., Yang X., Wang K. Gadolinium-induced oxidative stress triggers endoplasmic reticulum stress in rat cortical neurons. J. Neurochem. 2011; 117(1): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07162.x


Review

For citations:


Sosedova L.M., Novikov M.A., Titov E.A., Pankova A.A., Vokina V.A., Kon’kova T.V., Sukhov B.G. Comparative characteristics of acute toxicity of gadolinium-containing drugs for MRI diagnostics. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2026;105(3):327-332. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2026-105-3-327-332. EDN: qflhdz

Views: 422

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-9900 (Print)
ISSN 2412-0650 (Online)
X