Preview

Hygiene and Sanitation

Advanced search

Influence of the in vitro effect of electromagnetic radiation from a mobile phone on the antigen-specific activity of blood T-lymphocytes in people who have had COVID-19

https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2026-105-4-350-355

EDN: pshpgy

Abstract

Introduction. The immune system is one of the objects most sensitive to the effects of the electromagnetic fields. At the same time, the opinion that the effect of radio frequency EMR on cells, tissues, and systems of living organisms is shown at the present stage as distinct and significant is not generally accepted.

The aim of the work was to study the effect of EMR on the activity of immune memory T cells against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in vitro when using an irradiation regime corresponding to the usual use of a mobile phone.

Materials and methods. The test equipment is a mobile phone with parameters: SAR for the body 1.18 W/kg, for the head 1.25 W/kg, the maximum possible number of functions (bluetooth, WiFi) are connected to the phone.

The object of the research was blood samples from forty six people who had suffered from COVID-19 (22 people were ill from November 2020 to July 2021 and 24 were ill from December 2022 to March 2023).

Polystyrene plates from the SARS-CoV-2-IgG-ELISA test systems were used for antigenic stimulation (produced by JSC Vector-Best, Russia). To assess the effect of mobile phone EMR, each cell sample (intact or AG-stimulated) was divided into 2 portions. One portion was incubated for 4 hours in the presence of an EMP mobile phone, the second without it. Next, the concentration of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in the filler fluid was determined by the ELISA method on test systems from the same company.

Results. The effect of EMR has been shown to be expressed in a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the activity of memory T cells, which, after exposure to EMR, produce IFN-γ weaker during antigen recognition. Only in 4 out of 46 patients, increased activity of memory T cells was detected during antigenic stimulation of lymphocytes in the presence of mobile phone EMR. The average decrease in IFN-γ production was 151.3 ± 80.8 pg/ml or 66.6 ± 11.4% of the baseline level of antigen-stimulated IFN-γ production by patient lymphocytes.

Limitations: the use of an in vitro approach.

Conclusion. Further investigation of the effect of electromagnetic radiation from a mobile phone on AG-induced lymphocyte activity in people who have suffered from COVID-19 will determine whether the hypersensitivity of AG-specific cells to EMR is associated with impaired immune regulation due to the disease, or EMR can adversly affect AG-specific T cells in healthy people.

Compliance with ethical standards. All T-donors gave informed consent to participate in the study, approved by the Ethics Committee of the G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology (Protocol No. 41 dated 12/10/2020).

Contribution:
Kapustin I.V. – analysis of experimental data, design of illustrations;
Tulskaya E.A. – literature data analysis, database maintenance;
Blyakher M.S. – research concept and design, editing;
Sandalova S.V. – literature data analysis, material collection;
Odintsov E.E. – material collection, editing;
Koteleva S.I. – cultural research, text writing;
Ramazanova Z.K. – collection of material;
Fedorova I.M. – statistical processing, text writing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: April 2, 2025 / Revised: November 24, 2025 / Accepted: March 24, 2026 / Published: May 18, 2026

About the Authors

Ivan V. Kapustin
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Russian Federation

PhD (Medicine), leading researcher, Laboratory of immunology, G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, 125212, Russian Federation

e-mail: vano-kapusta@inbox.ru



Elena A. Tulskaya
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman
Russian Federation

PhD (Biology), leading researcher, Department of water hygiene, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: tulskaya.ea@fncg.ru



Mariya S. Blyakher
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Russian Federation

DSc (Medicine), professor, head, Laboratory of immunology, G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, 125212, Russian Federation

e-mail: maria.s.b@bk.ru



Svetlana V. Sandalova
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Russian Federation

Researcher, Laboratory of immunology, G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, 125212, Russian Federation

e-mail: s.sandalova74@mail.ru



Evgeny E. Odintsov
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Russian Federation

PhD (Medicine), senior researcher, Laboratory of immunology, G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, 125212, Russian Federation

e-mail: evgenyodin@yahoo.com



Svetlana I. Koteleva
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Russian Federation

PhD (Medicine), leading researcher, Laboratory of immunology, G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, 125212, Russian Federation

e-mail: felileo@yandex.ru



Zarema K. Ramazanova
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Russian Federation

PhD (Medicine), leading researcher, Laboratory of immunology, G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, 125212, Russian Federation

e-mail: rzarema@mail.ru



Irina M. Fedorova
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology
Russian Federation

PhD (Medicine), leading research assistant, Laboratory of immunology, G.N. Gabrichevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow, 125212, Russian Federation

e-mail: vestnik-07@mail.ru



References

1. Gubernsky Yu.D., Goshin M.E., Kalinina N.V., Banin I.M. Hygienic aspects of electromagnetic pollution of indoor environment. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2016; 95(4): 329–35. https://elibrary.ru/vzvzhz (in Russian)

2. Szmigielski S. Reaction of the immune system to low-level RF/MW exposures. Sci. Total. Environ. 2013; 454-455: 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.034

3. Schuermann D., Mevissen M. Manmade electromagnetic fields and oxidative stress-biological effects and consequences for health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021; 22(7): 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073772

4. Askaripour K., Żak A. A mechanistically approached review upon assorted cell lines stimulated by athermal electromagnetic irradiation. Cell Cycle. 2023; 22(11): 1319–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2023.2206682

5. Romeo S., Zeni O., Scarfì M.R., Poeta L., Lioi M.B., Sannino A. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and apoptosis: a scoping review of in vitro studies on мammalian cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022; 23(4): 2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042322

6. Piszczek P., Wójcik-Piotrowicz K., Guzdek P., Gil K., Kaszuba-Zwoińska J. Protein expression changes during phagocytosis influenced by low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022; 217: 481–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.080

7. Arthamin M.Z., Sulalah A., Resvina R., Widodo C., Endharti A.T., Widjajanto E., et al. Exposure of 1800 MHz radiofrequency with SAR 1,6 W/kg caused a significant reduction in CD4+ T cells and release of cytokines in vitro. Iran. J. Immunol. 2020; 17(2): 154–66. https://doi.org/10.22034/iji.2020.84760.1671

8. Kimata H. Microwave radiation from cellular phones increases allergen-specific IgE production. Allergy. 2005; 60(6): 838–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00802.x

9. Stronati L., Testa A., Moquet J., Edwards A., Cordelli E., Villani P., et al. D Lloyd 935 MHz cellular phone radiation. An in vitro study of genotoxicity in human lymphocytes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2006; 82(5): 339–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000600739173

10. Blyakher M.S., Tulskaya E.A., Kapustin I.V., Fedorova I.M., Nesterenko V.G., Suslov A.P., et al. Impact of a cellphone electromagnetic radiation on phagocytic activity of neutrophils in vitro. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2020; 99(9): 925–9. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-9-925-929 https://elibrary.ru/aggqml (in Russian)

11. Blyakher M.S., Tulskaya E.A., Kapustin I.V., Fedorova I.M., Lopatina T.K., Nesterenko V.G., et al. The impact of electromagnetic radiation of mobile phone for lymphocyte activation in vitro. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2017; 96(10): 965–70. https://elibrary.ru/zwsrsj (in Russian)

12. Vladimirov I.S., Zhdanova A.S., Mukhin V.E., Makarov V.V., Yudin V.S., Kraevoy S.A. Identification and functional characteristic of SARS-CoV-2-specific T lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients up to 16 months after disease onset. Meditsinskaya immunologiya. 2024; 26(3): 555–68. https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-IAF-2921 https://elibrary.ru/nkhniq (in Russian)

13. Flaxman А., Ewer К.J. Methods for measuring T-cell memory to vaccination: from mouse to man. Vaccines (Basel). 2018; 6(3): 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6030043

14. Golubovskaya V., Wu L. Different subsets of T cells, memory, effector functions, and CAR-T immunotherapy (review). Cancers (Basel). 2016; 8(3): 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8030036

15. Blyakher M.S., Kapustin I.V., Koteleva S.I., Odintsov E.E., Ramazanova Z.K., Sandalova S.V., et al. Method for determining the specific cellularimmune response to coronavirus antigens (SARS-CoV-2). Patent RF No. №2780369; 2022. (in Russian)

16. Blyakher M.S., Fedorova I.M., Tulskaya E.A., Kapustin I.V., Koteleva S.I., Ramazanova Z.K., et al. Assessment of specific T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 virus antigens in COVID-19 reconvalescents. Voprosy virusologii. 2022; 67(6): 527–37. https://doi.org/10.36233/0507-4088-151 https://elibrary.ru/yoyzob (in Russian)

17. Sieroń K., Knapik K., Onik G., Romuk E., Birkner E., Kwiatek S., et al. Electromagnetic fields modify redox balance in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Front. Public Health. 2021; 13(9): 710484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.710484

18. Yadav H., Singh R. Immunomodulatory role of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation in human leukemia monocytic cell line. Environ. Pollut. 2023; 331(Pt. 2): 121843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121843

19. Order of Government of the Russian Federation № 959-r «On approval of the strategic direction in the field of digital transformation of healthcare»; 2024. (in Russian)

20. Tyrov I.A., Tokarev A.S., Nebytova A.K., Zavalko A.F. Managing changes following introduction of digital technologies in inpatient medical organizations: Moscow’s experience. Natsional’noe zdravookhranenie. 2021; 2(2): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.2.47-54 https://elibrary.ru/ojyspd (in Russian)

21. Verified Market Report. The main trends in the field of medical tablet PCs: mobility, security and intelligent integration. Available at: https://verifiedmarketreports.com/ru/blog/top-7-trends-in-medical-tablet-pc/ (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Kapustin I.V., Tulskaya E.A., Blyakher M.S., Sandalova S.V., Odintsov E.E., Koteleva S.I., Ramazanova Z.K., Fedorova I.M. Influence of the in vitro effect of electromagnetic radiation from a mobile phone on the antigen-specific activity of blood T-lymphocytes in people who have had COVID-19. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2026;105(4):350-355. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2026-105-4-350-355. EDN: pshpgy

Views: 386

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-9900 (Print)
ISSN 2412-0650 (Online)
X