Quality of drinking water of underground water supply sources in rural areas: status and health risk assessment

Introduction. Taking into account the key activities of the federal project «Water of Russia», the preservation of public health is of particular importance.

Aim of the study. To assess the quality and safety of drinking water from underground water supply sources for the health of the population living in rural areas of the southern Baikal region.

Materials and methods. Study used data from the regional information fund for 2015‒2024. An assessment of the quality and safety of drinking water from underground sources in nine districts of the Republic of Buryatia was carried out, taking into account hygienic criteria, integral assessment and risk assessment of priority chemical pollutants. Statistical significance at p <0.05.

Results. During the study period, there was a 2.2-fold increase in the number of samples tested and indicators from 47 to 54 and a 1.4-fold decrease in the specific gravity of samples that did not meet hygienic criteria. At the same time, there are excess hygienic standards for 18 indicators and increased values of hazard coefficients for two substances. In the Tarbagatai, Ivolginsky, and Kabansky districts, the discrepancy between drinking water and hygienic standards remains due to the influence of anthropogenic factors and the hydrogeological conditions of groundwater that contribute to them.

Limitations. Frequency of monitoring, limited knowledge of cumulative effect of chemicals presents in water assessed by water quality index.

Conclusion. According to the drinking water quality index in rural areas of the southern Baikal region, 7 districts with “very clean” water and 2 with “moderately polluted” were distinguished.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require the submission of the conclusion of the Biomedical Ethics Committee.

Contribution:
Bogdanova O.G. ‒ concept and design of the study, collection of material, analysis and interpretation of data, writing text, editing;
Maraktaev Z.V. ‒ organization of the study, collecting material, statistical data processing, writing the primary version of the text;
Efimova N.V. ‒ study design, analysis and interpretation of data, editing;
Pankov V.A. ‒ analysis and interpretation of data, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study was performed within the framework of the state assignment of East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Received: May 31, 2026 / Accepted: June 18,  2026 / Published: July 31, 2026

1. Popova A.Yu., Kuzmin S.V., Mehantyev I.I. Assessment of implementation efficiency of the system approach to ensuring safety of public drinking and recreational water use on the example of the Voronezh Region. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2021; 29(8): 7–14. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2021-29-8-7-14 https://elibrary.ru/fdconj (in Russian)

2. Rakhmanin Yu.A., Onishchenko G.G. Hygienic assessment of drinking water supply of the population of the Russian Federation: problems and the way their rational decision. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2022; 101(10): 1158–66. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-10-1158-1166 https://elibrary.ru/hkiarc (in Russian)

3. Baydakova E.V., Unguryanu T.N. Quantitative microbial risk assessment for drinking water-associated population. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2024; 31(5): 352–65. https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco635356 https://elibrary.ru/tvqhgr (in Russian)

4. Kleyn S.V., Zaitseva N.V., Glukhikh М.V., Vekovshinina S.А., Andrishunas А.М., Klyachin А.А., et al. Integrated approach to assessing drinking water quality and its influence on human health to evaluate effectiveness and performance of project activity. Health Risk Analysis. 2025; (4): 47–61. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2025.4.05.eng https://elibrary.ru/abgbec

5. Wu J. Challenges for safe and healthy drinking water in China. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2020; 7(3): 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00274-5 https://elibrary.ru/hlydsg

6. Praveena S.M., Aris A.Z., Hashim Z., Hashim J.H. Drinking water quality status in Malaysia: a scoping review of occurrence, human health exposure, and potential needs. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2024; 34(1): 161–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00585-3 https://elibrary.ru/xjeexo

7. Rajan M., Karunanidhi D., Gurugnanam B., Subramani T. Assessment of groundwater suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes with probable health threats in a semiarid river basin of South India. Water Environ. Res. 2025; 97(2): e70011. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70011 https://elibrary.ru/uxjqkh

8. WHO. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2022: special focus on gender; 2023. Available at: https://who.int/publications/m/item/progress-on-household-drinking-water--sanitation-and-hygiene-2000-2022---special-focus-on-gender

9. Scanlon B.R., Fakhreddine S., Reedy R.C., Yang Q., Malito J.G. Drivers of spatiotemporal variability in drinking water quality in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022; 56(18): 12965–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08697 https://elibrary.ru/mohfuo

10. Wang H., Fan W., Niu Y., Chen F. Change of drinking water quality in Shijiazhuang South-to-North Water Diversion area from 2014 to 2021. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2023; 52(2): 232–8. https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2023.02.010 (in Chinese)

11. Millner S., Malina N., Rogers S.R., Henderson E., Ojeda A.S. Drinking private well water: Groundwater quality and management of wells in southern Alabama. J. Water Health. 2025; 23(2): 260–75. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2025.380 https://elibrary.ru/yxdvmu

12. Ilunde J., Mpumi N., Mwema M.F., Machunda R.L. Investigation of Waltheria indica L. (sleepy morning plant) as pathogen killing agent from shallow well water revealed a potential alternative for water disinfection. PLoS One. 2025; 20(9): e0330987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330987 https://elibrary.ru/chohyq

13. Onishchenko G.G. The sanitary and epidemiological situation in the Baikal region and its influence on human health. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2005; 84(1): 5–7. https://elibrary.ru/ojnpsf (in Russian)

14. Rukavishnikov V.S., Efimova N.V., Savchenkov M.F., Mylnikova I.V., Lisovtsov A.A. Quality of drinking water and risk to the health of the population of the south Baikal region (Russia). Emerg. Contam. 2024; 10(2): 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100300 https://elibrary.ru/cnxctw

15. Beshentsev A.N., Petrov S.A., Borisova T.A., Lubsanov A.A. Cartographic assessment of the long-term dynamics of the nature use of the delta territory by different-time topographic maps. Vestnik SGUGiT (Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta geosistem i tekhnologii). 2024; 29(2): 62–72. https://doi.org/10.33764/2411-1759-2024-29-2-62-72 https://elibrary.ru/ppecii (in Russian)

16. Konovalova T.I. Natural features and landscapes of the Selenga Delta region (Baikal Natural Area). Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Nauki o Zemle. 2024; 48: 25–40. https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2024.48.25 https://elibrary.ru/htzyrf (in Russian)

17. Buryatstat. The main results of the 2020 All-Russian Population Census in the Republic of Buryatia; 2023. Available at: https://03.rosstat.gov.ru/vpn2020 (in Russian)

18. Krasovskiy G.N., Rakhmanin Yu.A., Egorova N.A. Hygienic justification of optimization of the integrated assessment of drinking water according to the water quality index. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2015; 94(5): 5–10. https://elibrary.ru/uduvfp (in Russian)

19. Salazar Flores C.A., Kurbatova A.I., Mikhaylichenko K.Yu. Drinking water quality assessment according to water quality index and health risk assessment: а case study of Pedro Vicente Maldonado canton, Ecuador. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekologiya i bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti [RUDN Journal of Ecology and Life Safety]. 2022;30(3):373–392. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2022-30-3-373-392 (in Russian)

20. Beshir A., Reddythota D., Alemayehu E. Evaluation of drinking water quality and associated health risks in Adama City, Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2024; 10(16): e36363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36363 https://elibrary.ru/pxabqg

21. Mohammadpour A., Keshtkar M., Samaei M.R., Isazadeh S., Mousavi Khaneghah A. Assessing water quality index and health risk using deterministic and probabilistic approaches in Darab County, Iran; A machine learning for fluoride prediction. Chemosphere. 2024; 352: 141284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141284 https://elibrary.ru/tqmdyx

22. Bogdanova O.G., Efimova N.V., Bagaeva E.E., Tarmaeva N.A. Risk assessment for public health associated with nitrate content in crop products. Voprosy pitaniya. 2021; 90(3): 40–9. https://doi.org/10.33029/0042-8833-2021-90-3-40-49 https://elibrary.ru/fwwdoq (in Russian)

23. WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda; 2022. Available at: https://who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045064

24. Bogdanova O.G., Efimova N.V., Bagaeva E.E. Health risk assessment of the population of the Republic of Buryatia associated with increased nitrate and nitrite intake. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2022; (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.17816/humeco83797 https://elibrary.ru/zilasu (in Russian)

25. Efimov A.I., Doronina M.A., eds. Hydrogeology of the USSR. Volume XXII. Buryat ASSR [Gidrogeologiya SSSR. Tom XXII. Buryatskaya ASSR]. Moscow: Nedra; 1970. (in Russian)

26. Srivastava S., Flora S.J.S. Fluoride in drinking water and skeletal fluorosis: a review of the global impact. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2020; 7(2): 140–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00270-9 https://elibrary.ru/jvmhhr

27. Tashauoei H.R., Mahdavi M., Mahvi A.H., Fatehizadeh A. Dataset of fluoride concentration and health risk assessment in drinking water in the Saveh City of Markazi Province, Iran. Data Brief. 2023; 50: 109466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109466 https://elibrary.ru/epvnlw

28. Zhang J., Xiao C., Liang X., Yang W., Zhang L., Dai R., et al. A Bayesian Maximum Entropy Fusion model for enhanced prediction and risk assessment of fluoride and arsenic contamination in groundwater. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2025; 274: 104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2025.104664 https://elibrary.ru/iflbhx