Hygienic assessment of water quality in the rivers of the Don basin in the Voronezh region

Introduction. The importance of rivers as one of the main types of water resources lies in their use for water supply, irrigation of agricultural lands, fishing, and recreational purposes. At the same time, pollution of rivers as a result of economic activity is a global problem.

The purpose of the study was a hygienic assessment of the water quality in the rivers of the Don basin in the Voronezh Region.

Materials and methods. Object of research: rivers of the Voronezh region. Subject of the study: sanitary and chemical indicators of the water quality. The study used primary data from the Voronezh Center for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring for 2023-2025 at 22 monitoring control points on 7 rivers for 4 generalized indicators and 10 substances.

Results. The priority indicators of water quality in rivers for non-compliance with hygienic standards include dissolved oxygen, BOC₅, COС, iron content (total), copper (total). Non-compliance of water quality indicators with hygienic standards was revealed in the Don, Chernaya Kalitva, Tikhaya Sosna, Bityug, and Khoper rivers. At the monitoring points of control of the Don River, there are significant differences in the average values of the water quality indicators downstream in relation to the control point located above. The adverse impact of diffuse and man-made runoff from the territories of populated areas, and above all, the cities of Voronezh and Pavlovsk, is traced. The sections of the Don River from Novovoronezh to Liski are relatively safe.

Limitations. The limitations of the study are related to the discrete nature of monitoring the water quality in rivers (4 times a year), the annual and seasonal variability of river water regimes due to the volume of precipitation, and other changing natural and man-made factors.

Conclusion. According to the results of the study, the priority sanitary and chemical indicators of water quality in rivers for the region and the most polluted places and rivers were identified.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require the submission of a conclusion from the biomedical ethics committee or other documents.

Contributions:
Klepikov O.V. – concept and design of the study;
Kurolap S.A. – concept and design of the study;
Molokanova L.V. – preparation of the review and the introduction section;
Kulnev V.V. – general analysis of the material, preparation of conclusions, preparation and editing of the article;
Kizeev A.N. – significant contribution to the concept of the study, preparation of conclusions, final approval of the manuscript;
Nikanov A.N. – significant contribution to the concept of the study, preparation of conclusions, final approval of the manuscript.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank Alexander I. Sushkov, Head of the Voronezh Center for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, for the primary data provided for the analysis and for his interest in cooperation with the Department of Geoecology and Environmental Monitoring at the Voronezh State University.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The research was carried out at the expense of the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 25-17-00219 “Integrated hydroecological diagnostics and monitoring of environmental risks of drinking and recreational water use in the Verkhnedonsky basin”, https://rscf.ru/project/25-17-00219/.

Received: April 17, 2026 / Revised: May 12, 2026 / Accepted: July 1, 2026 / Published: September 28, 2026

1. Ngubane Z., Dzwairo B., Bergion V., Sokolova E., Troell K., Amoah I.D., et al. Water quality modelling and quantitative microbial risk assessment for uMsunduzi River in South Africa. J. Water Health. 2022; 20(4): 641–56. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2022.266 https://elibrary.ru/tdrscl

2. Madilonga R.T., Edokpayi J.N., Volenzo E.T., Durowoju O.S., Odiyo J.O. Water quality assessment and evaluation of human health risk in Mutangwi River, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(13): 6765 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136765

3. Markert N., Guhl B., Feld C.K. Water quality deterioration remains a major stressor for macroinvertebrate, diatom and fish communities in German rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2024; 907: 167994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167994 https://elibrary.ru/czwrkh

4. Huang L., Chen X., Yuan Z., Ye C., Liang Y. Impact of landscape patterns on water quality in urbanized rivers at characteristic scale: a case of Pearl River delta, China. Environ. Manage. 2024; 74(4): 715–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02017-w https://elibrary.ru/aetlmf

5. He M., Liu G., Wu L., Zhou L., Liu Y. Spatial-temporal distribution, occurrence, water quality, and risk assessment of trace elements in ten rivers surrounding Chaohu Lake in China. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2023; 45(5): 2167–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-022-01329-2 https://elibrary.ru/kqakes

6. Nihalani S., Meeruty A. Water quality index evaluation for major rivers in Gujarat. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021; 28(45): 63523–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10509-5 https://elibrary.ru/wdhgtb

7. Chandel S., Kaur H., Benbi D.K., Singh D., Kaur M., Singh K. Reflecting on changes in the drinking and irrigation water quality of rivers Beas, Satluj and confluence waters. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023; 30(60): 126132–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30849-2 https://elibrary.ru/vcnsgm

8. Zhoglo V.G. Forecast of changes in underground waters quality on the territory of the water catchment area of the Lesnaya and the Muhovets rivers. Prirodopol’zovanie. 2025; (1): 110–30. https://elibrary.ru/upnxvl (in Russian)

9. Mustafayev Zh.S., Ryskulbekova L.M. Geoecological assessment of surface water of a river basin with mathematical analysis (on the example of the Ile river). Gidrometeorologiya i ekologiya. 2021; (4): 6–19. https://elibrary.ru/kjhpxv (in Russian)

10. Obuhova M.V., Ivanyushin Yu.A. Long-term dynamics of the water quality of the Tura river. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2024; (5): 76–85. https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2024-21-5-76-85 https://elibrary.ru/jwyedq (in Russian)

11. Lavrenko N.Yu., Romanyuk O.L., Rogozina T.V. Dynamics of quality and results of monitoring the content of petroleum products in the rivers of the Yamalo-Nenets autonomous okrug (Russia). Arktika i Antarktika. 2025; (1): 92–107. https://doi.org/10.7256/2453-8922.2025.1.73034 https://elibrary.ru/rblxru (in Russian)

12. Sveshnikova E.V., Romanova E.M., Lyubomirova V.N., Shlenkina T.M. Hydrochemical assessment of the water quality of the Sviyaga river bay in the city of Ulyanovsk. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii veterinarnoi meditsiny im. N.E. Baumana. 2023; 254(2): 236–41. https://doi.org/10.31588/2413_4201_1883_2_254_236 https://elibrary.ru/jplgfw (in Russian)

13. Dubov N.D., Krokhin G.B., Rozental O.M. Influence of the groundwater runoff composition characteristics on the Moskva river water. Vodnoe khozyaistvo Rossii: problemy, tekhnologii, upravlenie. 2025; (5): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.35567/1999-4508-2025-5-23-38 https://elibrary.ru/xpiigm (in Russian)

14. Belyakova A.M., Zueva N.V. Assessment of river water quality in the city by hydrochemical indices (the Okhta river, St. Petersburg). Trudy Karel’skogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2021; (9): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.17076/lim1458 https://elibrary.ru/xgrqje (in Russian)

15. Knyazeva T.V., Tambieva N.S. Studying the impact of the Temernik river on the water quality in the lower reaches of the Don River. Vodnye bioresursy i sreda obitaniya. 2025; 8(3): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.47921/2619-1024_2025_8_3_7 https://elibrary.ru/hltiin (in Russian)

16. Dega N.S., Onishchenko V.V., Teunaev O.Kh. Dynamics of changes in water quality in the upper reaches of the Kuban river. Problemy regional’noi ekologii. 2025; (1): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.24412/1728-323X-2025-1-49-56 https://elibrary.ru/schklu (in Russian)

17. Mishchenko O.A., Gladun I.V., Ananyev N.A. Monitoring analysis of water quality in the amur river. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2022; (4–2): 28–34. https://elibrary.ru/wiamgd (in Russian)

18. Dzhamalov R.G., Reshetnyak O.S., Vlasov K.G., Galagur K.G., Oboturov A.S., Safronova T.I. Specific features of water chemistry and quality in the Lena river basin. Voda i ekologiya: problemy i resheniya. 2021; (3): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.23968/2305-3488.2021.26.3.33-43 https://elibrary.ru/kwrakq (in Russian)

19. Reshetnyak O.S., Kosmenko L.S., Kovalenko A.A. Anthropogenic load and water quality at the main-stream sections of rivers in the arctic zone of Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya. 2022; (3): 3–17. https://elibrary.ru/jhdxsu (in Russian)

20. Kovshov A.A., Novikova Yu.A., Myasnikov I.O., Tikhonova N.A., Fedorov V.N., Isaev D.S. Analysis of population health in relation to drinking water quality in Murmansk oblast. Rossiiskaya Arktika. 2022; (4): 5–16. https://elibrary.ru/qgytcj (in Russian)

21. Stepanyan A.A., Isaev D.S., Kovshov A.A., Sergeev A.A. Hygienic assessment of the quality of the drinking water from surface water sources in the Murmansk Region. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2025; 104(8): 1056–64. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-8-1056-1064 https://elibrary.ru/ieaqhw (in Russian)

22. Zhigulina E.V. Landscape and recreational load of the left bank of the Tikhaya Sosna river valley in the town of Ostrogozhsk, Voronezh region. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya. 2023; (3): 4–12. https://elibrary.ru/kuqdvl (in Russian)

23. Zhigulina E.V., Mezhova L.A. Landscape-ecological approach to study the stability of the basins of small rivers of the Voronezh region. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2023; (2): 100–3. https://doi.org/10.25633/ETN.2023.02.08 https://elibrary.ru/huczpo (in Russian)

24. Kurepina V.A., Kiselev V.V., Kornilov A.G. Dynamics of the hydroecological situation in the Tikhaya Sosna river on the territory of the Belgorod and Voronezh regions. Regional’nye geosistemy. 2022; 46(1): 108–18. https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-7443-2022-46-1-108-118 https://elibrary.ru/rufduz (in Russian)

25. Klepikov O.V., Mekhantyev I.I., Shukelayt A.B., Vinogradov P.M., Larionov A.N., Gotsev D.V. Geoecological assessment of water quality in recreational water use sites of the population in the Voronezh region. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya. 2025; (4): 132–8. https://elibrary.ru/suksvu (in Russian)