Hygienic assessment of ultraviolet radiation in residential and public buildings

Introduction. In the premises of residential and public buildings there are widely used products being a source of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) mainly in the UV-A range (315–400 nm). Introduction of new technologies, change of technical characteristics of UVR sources sets one of the tasks to obtain information about the safety of their use.

The aim of the study. To carry out measurements of UVB energy illuminance produced by ultraviolet lamps for polymerization of coatings and ultraviolet insecticidal lamps, to assess compliance with hygienic standards.

Materials and methods. Six ultraviolet polymerization manicure lamps and four ultraviolet insecticidal lamps with different types of UVI sources of varying power were studied. Measurement points were placed at distances limited by the product design (manicure lamps) and at the distances of use (insecticide lamps). Measurements of UVI energy illuminance levels were carried out in an anechoic shielded chamber.

Results. Levels of radiation in the UV-A range, emitted by polymerization lamps of different type and power, were in the range from 17.1±2.0 W/m² to 37.0±4.3 W/m² and exceeded hygienic standards. The measurement results in this range from stationary insecticidal lamps demonstrated that the values corresponding to hygienic standards are registered at distances of at least 0.45 m, 0.5 m and 0.6 m from devices with total lamp power of 20, 40 and 80 W, respectively, from portable household insecticidal lamp – directly at the lamp body. The measurement results of UVI energy illuminance in the UV-B spectral range from all investigated polymerization and insecticidal lamps were within the permissible values, in the UV-C spectral range – below the sensitivity of the applied measuring instrument.

Limitations. The results of the study can only be applied to measurements of the energy illuminance of UV light produced by UV polymerization and insecticidal lamps (manicure and pedicure lamps, insect traps), using UV-Radiometers.

Conclusion. The widespread use of polymerization lamps poses one of the tasks of developing recommendations for their safe use, taking into account the technical characteristics of the lamps and the time of exposure. To reduce the adverse effects of UV insecticidal lamps, it is necessary to determine and ensure a safe distance from them to the nearest possible location of a person or place them in places of short-term stay of people.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require an opinion from a biomedical ethics committee or other documents.

Contributions:
Kriyt V.E. – research concept; editing;
Sladkova Yu.N. – research design; text writing;
Sklyar D.N. – research design; material processing;
Volchkova O.V.,  Plekhanov V.P. – material collection.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: April 25, 2025 / Revised: May 26, 2025 / Accepted: June 26, 2025 / Published: September 25, 2025

1. Askhakov M.S., Chebotarev V.V Ultraviolet irradiation of the skin and photoprotective in cosmetology. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki. 2017; (6): 5–13. https://elibrary.ru/lbxzfb (in Russian)

2. Scalbert C., Grenier M., Maire C., Cottencin O., Bonnevalle F., Behal H., et al. Indoor tanning: motivations and beliefs among users and non-users in the population of Lille (Northern France). Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie. 2015; 142(1): 10–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annder.2014.09.006 (in French)

3. Doré J.F., Chignol M.C. UV Driven Tanning Salons: Danger on Main Street. In: Ahmad S., eds. Ultraviolet Light in Human Health, Diseases and Environment. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 996. Cham: Springer; 2017: 335–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56017-5_28

4. Blokh A.I., Stasenko V.L. Surveillance for melanoma and other skin cancers at the regional level. Fundamental’naya i klinicheskaya meditsina. 2020; 5(1): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2020-5-1-64-70 https://elibrary.ru/xerwvc (in Russian)

5. Kriyt V.E., Sladkova Yu.N., Sklyar D.N., Plekhanov V.P., Volchkova O.V., Dubrovskaya E.N. Ultraviolet radiation from solariums: the main problems of measurement and evaluation of results. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2024; 103(8): 784–90. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-8-784-790 https://elibrary.ru/iwlzcr (in Russian)

6. Necz P.P., Bakos J. Photobiological safety of the recently introduced energy efficient household lamps. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2014; 27(6): 1036–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0332-2

7. Azizi M., Golmohammadi R., Aliabadi M. Comparative analysis of lighting characteristics and ultraviolet emissions from commercial compact fluorescent and incandescent lamps. J. Res. Health Sci. 2016; 16(4): 200–5.

8. Kriit V.E., Sladkova Yu.N., Sklyar D.N., Volchkova O.V., Plekhanov V.P. Instrumental monitoring of ultraviolet radiation generated by household and similar products used in residential and public buildings. In: Health and Environment. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference [Zdorov’e i okruzhayushchaya sreda. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii]. Gomel’: Editorial office of the newspaper «Gomel’skaya prawda»; 2024: 308–10. (in Russian)

9. Poster D.L., Postek M.T., Obeng Y.S., Kasianowicz J.J., Cowan T.E., Horn N.R., et al. Models for an ultraviolet-C research and development consortium. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 2022; 126: 126055. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.055

10. Smirnov A.A., Dovlatov I.M. Development of a UV-irradiation facility to combat group IV viruses. Vestnik NGIEI. 2020; (12): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-9407-2020-10119 https://elibrary.ru/zyexxp (in Russian)

11. Rakhmanin Yu.A., Kalinina N.V., Gaponova E.B., Zagainova A.V., Nedachin A.E., Doskina T.V. Hygienic assessment of the safety and efficiency of using ultraviolet plants of the closed type for disinfection of the air environment in the rooms of inpatients facilities. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2019; 8(98): 804–10. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2019-98-8-804-810 https://elibrary.ru/vvaxbn (in Russian)

12. Kostyuchenko S.V., Vasilev A.I., Tkachev A.A., Zagainova A.V., Kurbatova I.V., Abramov I.A., et al. Study of the effectiveness of the use of closed-type UV-recirculators for air disinfection in enclosed space. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2021; 11(100): 1229–35. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-11-1229-1235 https://elibrary.ru/metwcq (in Russian)

13. Sliney D.H., Gilbert D.W. 2nd, Lyon T. Ultraviolet safety assessments of insect light traps. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2016; 13(6): 413–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1125489

14. Khoury A., Young K., O’Neill J. UV nail lamps, is there a malignancy risk? A review of the literature. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2020; 73(5): 983–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.01.022

15. Słabicka-Jakubczyk A., Lewandowski M., Pastuszak P., Barańska-Rybak W., Górska-Ponikowska M. Influence of UV nail lamps radiation on human keratinocytes viability. Sci. Rep. 2023; 13(1): 22530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49814-7

16. Metko D., Mehta S., Mcmullen E., Bednar E.D., Abu-Hilal M. A systematic review of the risk of cutaneous malignancy associated with ultraviolet nail lamps: what is the price of beauty? Eur. J. Dermatol. 2024; 34(1): 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2024.4616

17. Aguilera J., Bosch R.J., de Gálvez M.V. Discussion abounds on the potential carcinogenic risks associated with the use of UV curing lamps for permanent nail polish. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024; 115(6): T533–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2024.04.006

18. Shihab N., Lim H.W. Potential cutaneous carcinogenic risk of exposure to UV nail lamp: A review. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2018; 34(6): 362–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12398

19. Beylin D., Kornhaber R., Le Lagadec D., Cleary M. Assessing the health implications of UV/LED nail lamp radiation exposure during manicure and pedicure procedures: a scoping review. Int. J. Dermatol. 2025; 64(4): 659–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17669

20. Tomskii K.A. Features of ultraviolet radiation measurement during special assessment of working conditions. Promyshlennyi vestnik. 2014; (5): 4–5. (in Russian)

21. Panteleev S.V. Problems and prospects of metrological support for measurements of energy illumination. Glavnyi metrolog. 2015; (6): 1–5. (in Russian)