Preview

Hygiene and Sanitation

Advanced search

On the issue of adding the insecticide chlorpyrifos to Appendix A of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (literature review)

https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-12-1733-1740

EDN: mrgiml

Abstract

The Russian Science Citation Index and CyberLeninka, as well as the Internet resources of international organizations (WHO, etc.) and regulatory agencies of the countries listed in the review (US Environmental Protection Agency, etc.) with a search depth from 2018-2025 revealed differences in the approaches of global regulators to minimizing potential risks from the use of chlorpyrifos (CPFS), despite the European Union’s proposal to include it in the list of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) of the Stockholm Convention after new information emerged about its potential danger to the unborn child. To date, a complete ban on CPFS has been introduced by countries with a cold or temperate climate (Canada, EU), as well as exporting countries trading with the EU (Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nepal, Peru, Thailand, Turkey, Chile, Sri Lanka). At the same time, the Russian Federation, along with the United States of America and Australia, have significantly restricted the use of CPFS. The use of chlorpyrifos in agriculture remains unchanged in Mexico, China, and Brazil. Despite the affordability of some alternative chemical plant protection products available for some applications of CPFS, there is no complete analogue with the same broad spectrum of action on the market, which may deter developing countries from restricting or banning CPFS until it is officially included in Annex A of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, despite the potential risks it may pose to the safety of the unborn child.

Contribution:
Rakitskii V.N., Veshchemova T.E. – concept and design of the study, collection and analysis of literary data, writing the text;
Chkhvirkiya E.G., Masaltsev G.V. – concept and design of the study, collection and analysis of literary data, writing the text.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study was carried out within the framework of the industry programs of Rospotrebnadzor “Scientific justification of the national system for ensuring sanitary and epidemiological well-being, health risk management and improving the quality of life of the population of Russia” (2021-2025).

Received: October 13, 2025 / Accepted: December 2, 2025 / Published: January 15, 2026

About the Authors

Valerii N. Rakitskii
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman
Россия

DSc (Medicine), professor, academician of the RAS, scientific director of the Institute of Hygiene, Toxicology of Pesticides and Chemical Safety of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: rakitskii.vn@fncg.ru



Tatiana E. Veshchemova
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman
Россия

PhD (Medicine), senior researcher, Occupational health department, Institute of Hygiene, Pesticide Toxicology and Chemical Safety, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: veshchemova.te@fncg.ru



Elena G. Chkhvirkiya
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman
Россия

DSc (Medicine), professor, chief researcher, Toxicology department, Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: chkhvirkiya.eg@fncg.ru



Gleb V. Masaltsev
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman
Россия

PhD (Biology), head, Toxicology department, Institute of Hygiene, pesticide toxicology and chemical safety, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: masalcev.gv@fncg.ru



References

1. Stockholm Convention of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Additional information relating to the draft risk management evaluation for chlorpyrifos. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.20/INF/5; 2024. Available at: https://pops.int/TheConvention/POPsReviewCommittee/Meetings/POPRC20/Overview/tabid/9850/Default.aspx

2. Stockholm Convention of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Draft risk management evaluation for chlorpyrifos. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.20/2; 2024. Available at: https://pops.int/TheConvention/POPsReviewCommittee/Meetings/POPRC20/Overview/tabid/9850/Default.aspx

3. European Food Safety Authority. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide human health risk assessment of the active substance chlorpyrifos. EFSA J. 2014; 12(4): 3640. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3640

4. Bhagwat A., Gaonkar O., Mohapatra P. Chlorpyrifos, a candidate POP in Stockholm Convention. Toxics Link. 2022. Available at: https://toxicslink.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Factsheets%20-%20chorpyrifos.pdf#:~:text=%5BPDF%5D%20CHLORPYRIFOS%20,insecticides%20chlorpyrifos%20and%20chlorpyrifos

5. European Food Safety Authority. Statement on the available outcomes of the human health assessment in the context of the pesticides peer review of the active substance chlorpyrifos. EFSA J. 2019; 17(5): 5809. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5809

6. Rauh V., Arunajadai S., Horton M., Perera F., Hoepner L., Barr D.B., et al. Seven-year neurodevelopmental scores and prenatal exposure to chlorpyrifos, a common agricultural pesticide. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011; 119(8): 1196–201. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003160

7. Perera F.P., Rauh V., Tsai W.Y., Kinney P., Camann D., Barr D., et al. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003; 111(2): 201–5. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5742

8. Rauh V.A., Garfinkel R., Perera F.P., Andrews H.F., Hoepner L., Barr D.B., et al. Impact of prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city children. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(6): e1845–59. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0338

9. Whyatt R.M., Rauh V., Barr D.B., Camann D.E., Andrews H.F., Garfinkel R., et al Prenatal insecticide exposures and birth weight and length among an urban minority cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004; 112(10): 1125–32. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6641

10. Whyatt R.M., Camann D., Perera F.P., Rauh V.A., Tang D., Kinney P.L., et al. Biomarkers in assessing residential insecticide exposures during pregnancy and effects on fetal growth. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005; 206(2): 246–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.11.027

11. Rauh V.A., Perera F.P., Horton M.K., Whyatt R.M., Bansal R., Hao X., et al. Brain anomalies in children exposed prenatally to a common organophosphate pesticide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109(20): 7871–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203396109

12. Rauh V.A., Garcia W.E., Whyatt R.M., Horton M.K., Barr D.B., Louis E.D. Prenatal exposure to the organophosphate pesticide chlorpyrifos and childhood tremor. Neurotoxicology. 2015; 51: 80–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2015.09.004

13. Federal Register. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Notice. Chlorpyrifos; End-Use Products Cancellation Order. [OPP-34203I; FRL-6799-7]. Available at: https://federalregister.gov/d/01-22756

14. Department of Pesticide Regulation. Final Toxic Air Contaminant Evaluation of Chlorpyrifos Risk Characterization of Spray Drift, Dietary, and Aggregate Exposures to Residential Bystanders. California Environmental Protection Agency; 2018.

15. Eskenazi B., Marks A.R., Bradman A., Harley K., Barr D.B., Johnson C., et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and neurodevelopment in young Mexican-American children. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007; 115(5): 792–8. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9828

16. Stein L.J., Gunier R.B., Harley K., Kogut K., Bradman A., Eskenazi B. Early childhood adversity potentiates the adverse association between prenatal organophosphate pesticide exposure and child IQ: The CHAMACOS cohort. Neurotoxicology. 2016; 56: 180–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.07.010

17. Berkowitz G.S., Wetmur J.G., Birman-Deych E., Obel J., Lapinski R.H., Godbold J.H., et al. In utero pesticide exposure, maternal paraoxonase activity, and head circumference. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004; 112(3): 388–91. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6414

18. Wolff M.S., Engel S., Berkowitz G., Teitelbaum S., Siskind J., Barr D.B., et al. Prenatal pesticide and PCB exposures and birth outcomes. Pediatr. Res. 2007; 61(2): 243–50. https://doi.org/10.1203/pdr.0b013e31802d77f0

19. Federal Register. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Rule. Chlorpyrifos; Tolerance Revocations; Notice of Data Availability and Request for Comment. 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0653; FRL-9954-65]. Available at: https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-27552

20. Wolff M.S., Engel S., Berkowitz G., Teitelbaum S., Siskind J., Barr D.B., et al. Prenatal pesticide and PCB exposures and birth outcomes. Pediatr. Res. 2007; 61(2): 243–50. https://doi.org/10.1203/pdr.0b013e31802d77f0

21. European Food Safety Authority. Updated statement on the available outcomes of the human health assessment in the context of the pesticides peer review of the active substance chlorpyrifos‐methyl. EFSA J. 2019; 17(11): 5908. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5908

22. European Council. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Official Journal of the European Union. 2008; L353/1. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008R1272

23. Bielawski D., Ostrea E. Jr., Posecion N. Jr., Corrion M., Seagraves J. Detection of several classes of pesticides and metabolites in meconium by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Chromatographia. 2005; 62(11–12): 623–9. https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-005-0668-7

24. Corrion M.L., Ostrea Jr. E.M., Bielawski D.M., Posecion Jr. N.C., Seagraves J.J. Detection of prenatal exposure to several classes of environmental toxicants and their metabolites by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry in maternal and umbilical cord blood. J. Chromatogr. B. Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2005; 822(1–2): 221–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.06.007

25. Engel S.M., Wetmur J., Chen J., Zhu C., Barr D.B., Canfield R.L., et al. Prenatal exposure to organophosphates, paraoxonase 1, and cognitive development in childhood. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011; 119(8): 1182–8. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003183

26. Fluegge K.R., Nishioka M., Wilkins J.R. 3rd. Effects of simultaneous prenatal exposures to organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides on infant neurodevelopment at three months of age. J. Environ. Toxicol. Public Health. 2016; 1: 60–73. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.218417

27. Ostrea E.M. Jr., Bielawski D.M., Posecion N.C. Jr., Corrion M., Villanueva-Uy E., Jin Y., et al. A comparison of infant hair, cord blood and meconium analysis to detect fetal exposure to environmental pesticides. Environ. Res. 2008; 106(2): 277–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2007.08.014

28. Ostrea E.M. Jr., Reyes A., Villanueva-Uy E., Pacifico R., Benitez B., Ramos E., et al. Fetal exposure to propoxur and abnormal child neurodevelopment at 2 years of age. Neurotoxicology. 2012; 33(4): 669–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2011.11.006

29. Posecion N. Jr., Ostrea E. Jr., Bielawski D., Corrion M., Seagraves J., Jin Y. Detection of exposure to environmental pesticides during pregnancy by the analysis of maternal hair using GC-MS. Chromatographia. 2006; 64(11–12): 681–7. https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-006-0092-7

30. Silver M.K., Shao J., Zhu B., Chen M., Xia Y., Kaciroti N., et al. Prenatal naled and chlorpyrifos exposure is associated with deficits in infant motor function in a cohort of Chinese infants. Environ. Int. 2017; 106: 248–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.015

31. Silver M.K., Shao J., Ji C., Zhu B., Xu L., Li M., et al. Prenatal organophosphate insecticide exposure and infant sensory function. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2018; 221(3): 469–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.010

32. Wickerham E.L., Lozoff B., Shao J., Kaciroti N., Xia Y., Meeker J.D. Reduced birth weight in relation to pesticide mixtures detected in cord blood of full-term infants. Environ. Int. 2012; 47: 80–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.007

33. European Chemicals Agency. Substance Infocard. Chlolpryrifos. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.018.969

34. ​Wołejko E., Łozowicka B., Jabłońska-Trypuć A., Pietruszyńska M., Wydro U. Chlorpyrifos occurrence and toxicological risk assessment: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19(19): 12209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912209

35. European Commission. Chlorpyrifos & Chlorpyrifos-methyl. Available at: https://food.ec.europa.eu/plants/pesticides/approval-active-substances-safeners-and-synergists/renewal-approval/chlorpyrifos-chlorpyrifos-methyl_en

36. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. EU Pesticides Database (v3.3). European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/start/screen/mrls/details?lg_code=EN&pest_res_id_list=56,57&product_id_list

37. Info Curia. Judgement of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) in Case T-77/20; 2023. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=278201&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3294758

38. Aidala J.V., Burchi L.R. Eighth. Circuit Court Vacates EPA Rule Revoking All Chlorpyrifos Tolerances. FIFRAblog®; 2023. Available at: https://lawbc.com/eight-circuit-court-vacates-epa-rule-revoking-all-chlorpyrifos-tolerances

39. Federal Register. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Final Rule. Chlorpyrifos; Tolerance Revocations. 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0523; FRL-5993-04-OCSPP]. Available at: https://federalregister.gov/d/2021-18091

40. The National Agricultural Law Center. Ninth Circuit Finds Chlorpyrifos Tolerances Unlawful. Available at: https://nationalaglawcenter.org/ninth-circuit-finds-chlorpyrifos-tolerances-unlawful/

41. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Chlorpyrifos; 2025. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/chlorpyrifos

42. Federal Register. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Final Rule. Chlorpyrifos; Tolerance Revocations. 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0431; FRL-12415-01-OCSPP]. Available at: https://federalregister.gov/d/2024-28332

43. Federal Register. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed Rule. Chlorpyrifos; Tolerance Revocation; Reopening of the Comment Period [EPA-HQ-OPP-2024-0431; FRL-12415-03-OCSPP]. Available at: https://federalregister.gov/d/2025-02788

44. Frederick A., Webster D.M. Hawai‘i does what EPA failed to do: first U.S. ban on chlorpyrifos enacted into law. Hawai‘i Alliance for Progressive Action; 2018. Available at: https://hapahi.org/blog/governor-ige-bans-neurotoxin-chlorpyrifos

45. Polansek T. Corteva to stop making pesticide linked to kids’ health problems. Reuters; 2020. Available at: https://reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/corteva-to-stop-making-pesticide-linked-to-kids-health-problems-idUSKBN20023H/

46. Pest Management Regulatory Agency. Re-evaluation Note REV2021-04, Cancellation of remaining chlorpyrifos registrations under paragraph 20(1)(a) of the Pest Control Products Act. Health Canada; 2021. Available at: https://canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/documents/services/consumer-product-safety/reports-publications/pesticides-pest-management/decisions-updates/reevaluation-note/2021/cancellation-remaining-chlorpyrifos-registrations/rev2021-04-eng.pdf

47. Beyond Pesticides. Mexico Announces Glyphosate-Roundup Phaseout; 2020. Available at: https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2020/07/mexico-announces-glyphosate-roundup-phaseout/

48. Godoy E. Mexico bans glysophate but tolerates other agrochemicals; 2021. Available at: https://nacla.org/mexico-amlo-glyphosate-pesticides/

49. Ruiz-Arias M.A., Medina-Díaz I.M., Bernal-Hernández Y.Y., Barrón-Vivanco B.S., González-Arias C.A., Romero-Bañuelos C.A., et al. The situation of chlorpyrifos in Mexico: a case study in environmental samples and aquatic organisms. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2023; 45(8): 6323–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01618-4

50. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam. Decision removal of agrochemicals containing chlorpyrifos ethyl and fipronil from the list of permissible agrochemicals in Vietnam No. 501/QD-BNN-BVTV; 2019. Available at: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/EN/Linh-vuc-khac/Decision-501-QD-BNN-BVTV-2019-removal-Chlorpyrifos-Ethyl-removed-from-permissible-agrochemicals/408404/tieng-anh.aspx#

51. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam. Circular. List of permissible and banned agrochemicals in Vietnam no. 10/2020/TT-BNNPTNT; 2020. Available at: https://fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC209585/#:~:text=Circular%20No.%2010%2F2020%2FTT,Agrochemicals

52. Pibanthan P. Thailand Votes to Ban Three Key Crop Protection Chemicals. AgriBusiness Global; 2019. Available at: https://agribusinessglobal.com/agrochemicals/thailand-votes-to-ban-three-key-crop-protection-chemicals/#:~:text=Chemicals%20www,to%20restrict%20use%20of%20glyphosate

53. Chemlinked. Thailand Enforced Ban on Paraquat and chlorpyrifos starting June 01 2020. REACH24 Consulting Group; 2020. Available at: https://agrochemical.chemlinked.com/news/thailand-enforced-ban-paraquat-and-chlorpyrifos-starting-june-1#

54. Foreign Agricultural Service. Attaché Report. Thailand: Thailand Moves Forward with Ban on Paraquat and Chlorpyrifos on 1 June 2020. United States Department of Agriculture; 2020. Available at: https://fas.usda.gov/data/thailand-thailand-moves-forward-ban-paraquat-and-chlorpyrifos-1-june-2020

55. Rotterdam Convention. Database of Notifications of Final Regulatory Action. Available at: http://pic.int/Procedures/NotificationsofFinalRegulatoryActions/Database/tabid/1368/language/enUS/Default.aspx.

56. Singh O. Three Insecticides to be prohibited in India: Central Govt issued a draft ban order. Agropages; 2023. Available at: https://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---45617.htm#

57. AgriBrasilis. Agrochemical Update Brazil & Latin America. Chlorpyrifos was banned in Peru; 2023. Available at: https://agribrasilis.com/2023/07/19/chlorpyrifos/

58. Brovini E.M., Quadra G.R., Paranaíba J.R., Carvalho L., Pereira R.O., de Aquino S.F. Occurrence and environmental risk assessment of 22 pesticides in Brazilian freshwaters. Aquat. Toxicol. 2023; 260: 106566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106566

59. Australian Government. Notice of decision on reconsideration under section 34AC of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code – affirmations for chlorpyrifos reconsideration. Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority. Special Gazette; 2024. Available at: https://www.apvma.gov.au/news-and-publications/publications/gazette/special-gazette-3-oct-24

60. State Catalog of Pesticides and Agrochemicals Permitted for Use in the Russian Federation. Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation; 2025. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Rakitskii V.N., Veshchemova T.E., Chkhvirkiya E.G., Masaltsev G.V. On the issue of adding the insecticide chlorpyrifos to Appendix A of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (literature review). Hygiene and Sanitation. 2025;104(12):1733-1740. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-12-1733-1740. EDN: mrgiml

Views: 21

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-9900 (Print)
ISSN 2412-0650 (Online)