Analysis of working conditions and health risk factors for medical workers in diagnostic laboratories (literature review)

The article presents a systematic analysis of the literature on working conditions and occupational attention is paid to the regulatory framework, classification of risk factors and preventive measures.

The purpose of the study is to analyze the working conditions and health risk factors in medical workers in diagnostic laboratories according to literary sources.

After analyzing the literature sources, we identified several groups of health risk factors for medical workers in diagnostic laboratories: chemical factors, biological factors, physical factors, radiation exposure, ergonomic factors, psycho-emotional factors, managerial factors.

Laboratory workers have been revealed to be at high risk of infectious diseases (hepatitis B/C, HIV), injuries from sharp piercing and cutting tools, exposure to chemicals and physical factors. Statistics show a high prevalence of injuries caused by non-compliance with safety standards.

At the same time, the positive impact of scientific and technological progress was noted: technological development leads to the emergence of new hazards: new chemicals, infectious agents, and equipment require constant monitoring of working conditions and updating occupational safety standards.

Conclusion. To ensure safe working conditions, it is necessary to systematically conduct a special assessment of working conditions, taking into account the specifics of laboratory activities. The introduction of modern protective equipment, the management of safe working hours and staff training are key measures to reduce occupational risks.

Contribution.
All authors contributed significantly to the research and preparation of the article.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: May 13, 2025 / Revised: October 13, 2025 / Accepted: March 24, 2026 / Published: May 18, 2026

1. WHO. Occupational risks in the healthcare sector. Available at: https://who.int/tools/occupational-hazards-in-health-sector

2. Bektasova M.V., Kiku P.F., Sheparev A.A. Identification of risk factors in assessment of the working conditions of medical personnel. Dal’nevostochnyi meditsinskii zhurnal. 2019; (2): 73–8. https://elibrary.ru/uydqkj (in Russian)

3. Pankov V.A., Kuleshova M.V. Occupational morbidity and injuries in health care of the Irkutsk region. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2021; 100(8): 839–44. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-8-839-844 https://elibrary.ru/lxosbk (in Russian)

4. Trubetskov A.D., Makhonko M.N., Shkrobova N.V., Shelekhova T.V., Chuslyaeva D.A. Risk factors for health in medical workers of modern dental practice (literature review). Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2023; 102(5): 452–6. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-5-452-456 https://elibrary.ru/opdkfc (in Russian)

5. The list of employees and the need of organizations for employees to fill vacant jobs by professional groups as of October 31, 2024. Rosstat; 2024. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/potr2024.xlsx

6. Taskingul A.B., Kiran S., Emerce E. Comparison of health complaints, occupational risks, and occupational health practices of healthcare workers according to professions and departments in the hospital. Cureus. 2024; 16(7): e65614. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65614

7. Faller E.M., Bin Miskam N., Pereira A. Exploratory study on occupational health hazards among health care workers in the Philippines. Ann. Glob. Health. 2018; 84(3): 338–41. https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2316

8. Güden E. Perspective on occupational health and safety of sterilization unit employees and unit safety. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2025; 22(7): 531–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2475103

9. Samarskaya N.A., Ilin S.M. Optimization of regulatory and legal support in the field of safety and occupational health. In: Modern Science and Technology: Collection of Articles of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference [Modern Science and Technology: Sbornik statei III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii]. Petrozavodsk: Novaya nauka; 2020: 5–12. https://doi.org/10.46916/31082020-2-978-5-907327-80-1 https://elibrary.ru/ymoyzt (in Russian)

10. Arkhipkin A.A., Nazirov M.R., Liang O.V., Kochetov A.G. The special assessment of working conditions in medical laboratories. Laboratornaya sluzhba. 2015; 4(1): 42–8. https://elibrary.ru/ucakyd (in Russian)

11. Meshkov N.A., Fesyun A.D., Yakovlev M.Yu., Rachin A.P., Valtseva E.A. Medical staff at sanatorium-resort organizations: working conditions and health risk factors. Vestnik vosstanovitel’noi meditsiny. 2022; 21(1): 126–36. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-1-126-136 https://elibrary.ru/vrcwlc (in Russian)

12. Kaminer D.D., Sheina N.I., Bulatseva M.B., Girina M.D., Sanakoeva E.Yu. Analysis of conditions and nature of work of therapists: a literature review. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2024; 32(1): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2024-32-1-84-93 https://elibrary.ru/hywwla (in Russian)

13. Nenakhov I.G. Hygienic assessment of working conditions of employees of testing laboratory centers: Diss. Moscow; 2019. (in Russian)

14. Izmerov N.F. Modern problems of occupational medicine in Russia. Meditsina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. 2015; (2): 5–12. https://elibrary.ru/txzdwh (in Russian)

15. Oborina S.V. Health assessment of healthcare workers of clinical and laboratory services depending on work environment and work process factors. Meditsina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. 2018; (2): 22–7. https://elibrary.ru/usbuii (in Russian)

16. Sivochalova O.V., Fesenko M.A., Golovaneva G.V., Morozova T.V., Gromova E.Yu. Regulatory and legal framework for prevention of violations of the reproductive health of workers occupied in hazardous industries in the Russian Federation. Health Risk Analysis. 2015; (2): 39–44. https://elibrary.ru/wckzgn

17. Dyreborg J., Lipscomb H.J., Nielsen K., Törner M., Rasmussen K., Frydendall K.B., et al. Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2022; 18(2): e1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1234

18. Reddy V.K., Lavoie M.C., Verbeek J.H., Pahwa M. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017; 11(11): CD009740. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009740.pub3

19. Zhukova S.A., Smirnov I.V. Analysis of labour conditions and protection of healthcare workers. Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniya. 2020; (4): 145–54. https://elibrary.ru/fbuico (in Russian)

20. Golovko E.A., Nesina I.A., Smirnova E.L., Poteryaeva E.L., Figurenko N.N., Demeshko K.O. Analysis of the health status of medical workers based on the results of mandatory periodic examinations. Meditsinskii vestnik Yuga Rossii. 2022; 13(4): 22–7. https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2022-13-4-22-27 https://elibrary.ru/nfkgok (in Russian)

21. Park J.K., Boyer J., Punnett L. Biomechanical exposure to upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder risk factors in hospital laboratories. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19(1): 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010499

22. Oborina S.V., Telesheva L.F., Kharunzhin V.V., Shestakova A.A. Effect of environmental factors on the immunological system condition of medical practitioners of clinical and laboratorial services. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2012; 91(3): 44. https://elibrary.ru/pewoaj (in Russian)

23. Panyushova E.P., Kiryushin V.A. Hygienic evaluation of working conditions and health state of medical personnel of paraclinical units. Nauka molodykh (Eruditio Juvenium). 2019; 7(1): 129–38. https://doi.org/10.23888/HMJ201971129-138 https://elibrary.ru/zahgmh (in Russian)

24. He G., Chen Y., Wang D., Wang H. Influencing factors of work stress of medical workers in clinical laboratory during COVID-19 pandemic: Working hours, compensatory leave, job satisfaction. Front. Public Health. 2023; 11: 1078540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078540

25. Gohar B., Nowrouzi-Kia B. The forgotten (invisible) healthcare heroes: experiences of Canadian medical laboratory employees working during the pandemic. Front. Psychiatry. 2022; 13: 854507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.854507

26. Djukic B., Nielsen C. Mental health status of medical laboratory professionals. Healthc. Manage. Forum. 2022; 35(4): 207–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704221088471

27. Kroft S.H. Well-Being, burnout, and the clinical laboratory. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020; 153(4): 422–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa022

28. Smith S.M., Liauw D., Dupee D., Barbieri A.L., Olson K., Parkash V. Burnout and disengagement in pathology: a prepandemic survey of pathologists and laboratory professionals. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2023; 147(7): 808–16. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0073-oa

29. Robakowska M., Tyrańska-Fobke A., Walkiewicz M., Tartas M. Adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism, and professional burnout among medical laboratory scientists. Med. Pr. 2018; 69(3): 253–60. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.00644

30. Ju K., Wu R., Yu J., Ding L., Xia M., Liu J., et al. Association of work ability with job burnout and sleep quality among biosafety laboratory personnel in Xinjiang, China: a cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health. 2025; 12: 1479257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1479257