Preview

Hygiene and Sanitation

Advanced search

Combined chemical exposures in metallurgical coke production and their health effects in workers

https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2026-105-5-525-532

EDN: yctuqe

Abstract

Introduction. Metallurgical coke production is a source of environmental pollution with harmful inorganic and organic substances possessing of specific effects on the human body. The relevance of this study is determined by the lack of information in the available literature on the working conditions of workers in by-product coke production facilities, taking into account the combined effects of harmful substances acting in the same direction.

The aim of the study. To assess health effects of combined occupational exposures to harmful chemicals in coke workers and develop measures to ensure chemical safety in the workplace.

Materials and methods. We have analyzed the results of coke oven shop workplace air testing for chemicals having acute, carcinogenic, reprotoxic, and fibrogenic health effects in workers. For the substances with a similar mechanism of action, we calculated summation coefficients to classify working conditions as harmful in terms of chemical risk.

Results. The workplace air in coke production is contaminated with a multicomponent mixture comprising chemicals of different hazard classes and mechanisms of action, such as carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide, benzene, benzo[a]pyrene, coke and coal dust, and hydroxybenzene. The chemical factor was assessed with account for possible additive effects of the combinations of pollutants acting similarly. When the summation coefficient was taken into account, the class of working conditions increased by 1 to 2 degrees of harmfulness due to chemical risk. Working under such conditions can pose a high potential risk of occupational diseases. Realized risks are associated with exposure to fibrous aerosols and carcinogens.

Limitations. The study was conducted within one coking plant utilizing dry coal distillation technology. Additional studies based on larger samples could identify other important factors affecting workers’ health and allow for risk accounting for workers at similar facilities.

Conclusion. The use of the summation coefficient for harmful chemicals having similar modes of action when assessing working conditions provides an objective description of the occupational setting, helps to assess work-related health risks to metallurgical coke workers and develop a set of health and safety measures to mitigate them.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require ethics approval. No personal data were used in the research.

Contribution:
Drugova O.G. – data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation, editing;
Fedoruk A.A. – study conception and design, manuscript preparation, editing;
Mikushina N.A. – data collection and analysis;
Karimova L.K. – study conception and design, editing;
Muldasheva N.A. – manuscript preparation;
Beigul N.A. – manuscript preparation;
Plotko E.G. – editing;
Shabardina L.V. – data collection and analysis.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of its final version.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: July 9, 2025 / Revised: April 9, 2026 / Accepted: May 20, 2026 / Published: June 18, 2026

About the Authors

Olga G. Drugova
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
Russian Federation

PhD (Biology), senior researcher, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation

e-mail: drugovao@ymrc.ru



Anna A. Fedoruk
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
Russian Federation

PhD (Medicine), leading researcher, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation

e-mail: annaf@ymrc.ru



Natalya A. Mikushina
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
Russian Federation

Junior researcher, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation

e-mail: mikushinana@ymrc.ru



Liliya K. Karimova
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers; Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology
Russian Federation

DSc (Medicine), professor, chief researcher, Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, Ufa, 450106, Russian Federation

e-mail: iao_karimova@rambler.ru



Nadezhda A. Muldasheva
Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology
Russian Federation

Researcher, Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, Ufa, 450106, Russian Federation

e-mail: muldasheva51@gmail.com



Natalia A. Beigul
Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology
Russian Federation

Senior researcher, PhD (Сhemistry), associate professor, Ufa Research Institute of Occupational Health and Human Ecology, Ufa, 450106, Russian Federation

e-mail: omt_ufnii@mail.ru



Eduard G. Plotko
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
Russian Federation

DSc (Medicine), scientific consultant, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation

e-mail: edvardp@ymrc.ru



Lada V. Shabardina
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
Russian Federation

Junior researcher, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation

e-mail: lada.shabardina@mail.ru



References

1. Díez M.A., Alvarez R., Barriocanal С. Coal for metallurgical coke production: predictions of coke quality and future requirements for cokemaking. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2002; 50(1–4): 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5162(02)00123-4

2. Kulikova M.P. The state of technology for coal pyrolysis. Prirodnye resursy, sreda i obshchestvo. 2020; (2): 70–6. https://elibrary.ru/pdbphq (in Russian)

3. Mu L., Li X., Liu X., Bai H., Peng L., Li Y., et al. Characterization and emission factors of carbonaceous aerosols originating from coke production in China. Environ. Pollut. 2021; 268(Pt. B): 115768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115768

4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Benzene. Atlanta; 2007.

5. Shi J., Deng H., Bai Z., Kong S., Wang X., Hao J., et al. Emission and profile characteristic of volatile organic compounds emitted from coke production, iron smelt, heating station and power plant in Liaoning Province, China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2015; 515–516: 101–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.034

6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Addendum to the Toxicological Profile for Benzene. Atlanta; 2015.

7. Wild C.P., Weiderpass E., Stewart B.W., eds. World Cancer Report: Cancer Research for Cancer Prevention. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.

8. Bieniek G., Łusiak A. Occupational exposure to aromatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at a coke plant. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2012; 56(7): 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes016

9. Singh A., Kamal R., Ahamed I., Wagh M., Bihari V., Sathian B., et al. PAH exposure-associated lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis. Occup. Med. (Lond.). 2018; 68(4): 255–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqy049

10. Xi J., Cao Y., Wang Y., You X., Liu W., Wang T., et al. PIG-A gene mutation as a mutagenicity biomarker among coke oven workers. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2023; 178: 113872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2023.113872

11. Duan X., Yang Y., Zhang D., Wang S., Feng X., Wang T., et al. Genetic polymorphisms, mRNA expression levels of telomere-binding proteins, and associates with telomere damage in PAHs-exposure workers. Chemosphere. 2019; 231: 442–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.134

12. Yan M., Cheng S., Wang S., Duan X., Mensah A.R., Li L., et al. Association of genetic polymorphisms of TERT with telomere length in coke oven emissions-exposed workers. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2023; 33(11): 1059–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2022.2069687

13. Yang K., Jiang X., Cheng S., Chen C., Cao X., Tu B. Effects of coke oven emissions and benzo[a]pyrene on blood pressure and electrocardiogram in coke oven workers. J. Occup. Health. 2017; 59(1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.15-0264-OA

14. He Q., Yan Y., Zhang Y., Wang X., Wang Y. Coke workers’ exposure to volatile organic compounds in northern China: a case study in Shanxi Province. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015; 187(6): 359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4582-7

15. Hadrup N., Mielżyńska-Švach D., Kozłowska A., Campisi M., Pavanello S., Vogel U. Association between a urinary biomarker for exposure to PAH and blood level of the acute phase protein serum amyloid A in coke oven workers. Environ. Health. 2019; 18(1): 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0523-1

16. Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–141. Available at: https://monographs.iarc.who.int/agents-classified-by-the-iarc/

17. Annenkova M.V., Kozhemyaka S.V., Belikov A.S. Assessment of the incidence of refractories during the repair of coke ovens with temporary disability. Vіsnik Pridnіprovs’koї derzhavnoї akademії budіvnitstva ta arkhіtekturi. 2011; (4): 47–51. https://elibrary.ru/ufzxxd (in Russian)

18. Amangeldin S.K. The effectiveness of measures to improve working conditions in the maintenance of coke batteries. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 1982; 61(1): 81–2. (in Russian)

19. Zholdakova Z.I., Kharchevnikova N.V., Mamonov R.A., Sinitsyna O.O. Methods for estimating the combined effect of substances. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2012; 91(2): 86–9. https://elibrary.ru/pffhgl (in Russian)

20. Shtabskii B.M., Fedorenko V.I. On two types of additive effect of combined action of harmful substances: definition of the concept and methods of assessment. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 1990; 69(2): 80–1. (in Russian)

21. Izmerov N.F., Denisov E.I. Occupational Health Risk (Manual) [Professional’nyi risk zdorov’yu (Rukovodstvo)]. Moscow: Trovant; 2003. (in Russian)

22. Cheng L., Wei W., Cheng S., Zhang C., Ye Z., Wang K., et al. Reductions of multiple air pollutants from coking industry through technology improvements and their impacts on air quality and health risks in a highly industrialized region of China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2024; 908: 168360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168360

23. Gerasimov S.V., Kolmakov N.G., Subbotin S.P. Incorporating BREF concepts at OAO Koks. Coke And Chemistry. 2015; 58(5): 184–7. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X15050038 https://elibrary.ru/ufdgkf

24. Popova A.Yu., Gurvich V.B., Kuzmin S.V., Mishina A.L., Yarushin S.V. Modern issues of the health risk assessment and management. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2017; 96(12): 1125–9. https://elibrary.ru/yqxmne (in Russian)

25. Savchenko Y.A., Minina V.I., Bakanova M.L., Glushkov A.N. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of industrial factors in coal mining and coal-processing industry (review). Russian Journal of Genetics. 2019; 55(6): 681–91. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795419060140 https://elibrary.ru/wjidbp

26. Blaginina T.F., Bolotnova T.V., Kuimova Zh.V., Kamshilova O.A. Personalized prevention of chronic non-infectious diseases in workers under conditions of harmful operational factors. Meditsinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala. 2023; 24(4): 16–21. https://elibrary.ru/tkpkjr (in Russian)

27. Shchekolodkina A.E., Evseeva S.A., Nagornyak A.S. Prospects for the use of preventive nutrition in enterprises of the Altai Territory. In: Food Hygiene in the XXI Century: Achievements and Prospects: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation [Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Gigiena pitaniya v XXI veke: dostizheniya i perspektivy»]. St. Petersburg; 2023: 240–4. https://elibrary.ru/ebmvul (in Russian)

28. Minigalieva I.A., Shtin T.N., Makeyev O.H., Panov V.G., Privalova L.I., Gurvic V.B., et al. Some outcomes and a hypothetical mechanism of combined lead and benzo(a)pyrene intoxication, and its alleviation with a complex of bioprotectors. Toxicol. Rep. 2020; 7: 986–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.08.004

29. Beygul N.A., Karimova L.K., Muldasheva N.A., Badikova A.D., Gimranova G.G. The assessment of working conditions by chemical factor with combined exposure to harmful substances. Bezopasnost’ truda v promyshlennosti. 2024; (4): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2024-4-39-45 https://elibrary.ru/jagurk (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Drugova O.G., Fedoruk A.A., Mikushina N.A., Karimova L.K., Muldasheva N.A., Beigul N.A., Plotko E.G., Shabardina L.V. Combined chemical exposures in metallurgical coke production and their health effects in workers. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2026;105(5):525-532. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2026-105-5-525-532. EDN: yctuqe

Views: 57

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-9900 (Print)
ISSN 2412-0650 (Online)
X